Quasi-Intellectuals

Proposition: Intellectuals are dangerous fools.
                    True or false?
                    I think it is true. I claim that it is true. Am I wrong? If you think so that is just fine; tell me why. NB Abuse is an admission that
                    you have nothing worth saying; that they are dangerous & fools too.

In 1555 AD the #Oxford Martyrs were captured by England's leading intellectuals, men at the University of Oxford, devoting their lives to study. These leading clerics were a brace of Anglican bishops Hugh Latimer, Nicholas Ridley plus Thomas Cranmer, the Archbishop of Canterbury. They were charged, given a fair trial, convicted, sentenced and  burnt at the stake. The charge was heresy. The guilty are now referred to as the Oxford Martyrs when they are remembered at all.

A few years earlier, in 1535 AD, #William Tyndale was also burnt at the stake in the Low Countries but they were not so vicious; strangling him to death first was kinder. His sin was translating The Bible into English. Possessing one was punishable by death in England but not in foreign parts.

Now, in 2020 AD, over 400 years later our leading intellectuals don't care about the Bible, they despise religion, especially Christianity but they care deeply about Global Warming and other Left Wing causes. Do they understand the science of global warming? Not if their chosen field was Mediaeval Latin or some such but they shout all the louder. It compensates for their ignorance.

It is the reality of #Mob Psychology. To be fair men at Oxford studying engineering or science are different, helping make the world a better place, learning useful things. They might even go on to prove it by starting firms producing things that people want. The humanities types are more likely to find themselves in the BBC, making careers by pretending to have the right opinions. That is #Mob Psychology or #Herd Mentality . If that means protecting Paedophile Perverts like Rolf Harris or marketing Paedophile Propaganda so be it. The price makes it all worthwhile. The favoured few do very nicely. One who did well for herself was Jo Cox, a mouthy ratbag who worked in the Charity Industry, snivelled to the right people then became the MP for Rotherham. She didn't care two pence for the English girls being Raped wholesale by Pakistani Perverts. She was a Cultural Marxist, one of the Enemy Within until Tommy Mair sorted her out. He got life for his pains.

One who studied #Herd Mentality ex Wiki was #Theodor Adorno, a Jew who ran the Frankfurt School. It infiltrated the Education Industry in America in order to Subvert. They succeeded brilliantly. The outputs of various universities are thoroughly Brainwashed; they really seem to believe that Blacks are victims of systematic Racism in Western Civilization, especially America.

Edward Bernays was a master of #Mob Psychology, of the #Herd Mentality. He manipulated the peasant masses for fun and profit. But the same techniques work just as well for our intellectual betters. How? Simple. Go to university, pay silly money to get there, swallow the tendentious fraud marketed by Marxist teachers. Regurgitate their views in exams to get a good degree. Then move on to work at the BBC or a similar Hard Left outfit. Learn more about his operations at The manipulation of the American mind Edward Bernays and the birth of public relations. Another great Spinmeister was Willi Münzenberg, who worked for the Communists.

The Puppet Masters, the Zionist crazies are winning. Western Civilization is being destroyed.

Other aspects of the same issue are explored in:- 

  1. Common Purpose

  2. Rent A Mob

  3. Lunatic Fringe

  4. Lenin's Useful Idiots

  5. Pathological Altruism

  6. Moral Cretin

  7. Modernism

  8. Postmodernism

  9. White Guilt     

  10. Dunning–Kruger Effect - overestimating one's ability

  11. Frankfurt School

  12. The Frankfurt School and Cultural Marxism: A Primer

  13. Trahison des Clercs

  14. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

  15. Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Oxford

  16. Legitimising Ideology

 

Furthermore be aware that many #Intellectuals Are Slobs.


Reasonable comments on our wonderful superiors, the men of real intelligence? Read for yourself. Think for yourself. Decide for yourself.

 

Oxford Martyrs ex Wiki
The Oxford Martyrs were Protestants tried for heresy in 1555 and burnt at the stake in Oxford, England, for their religious beliefs and teachings, during the Marian persecution in England. The three martyrs were the Anglican bishops Hugh Latimer, Nicholas Ridley and Thomas Cranmer, the Archbishop of Canterbury.

History
The three were tried at University Church of St Mary the Virgin, the official church of the University of Oxford on the High Street. The men were imprisoned at the former Bocardo Prison near the extant St Michael at the Northgate church (at the north gate of the city walls) in Cornmarket Street. The door of their cell is on display in the tower of the church.

The men were burnt at the stake just outside the city walls to the north, where Broad Street is now located. Latimer and Ridley were burnt on 16 October 1555. Cranmer was burnt five months later on 21 March 1556.

A small area paved with granite setts forming a cross in the centre of the road outside the front of Balliol College marks the site. The Victorian spire-like Martyrs' Memorial, at the south end of St Giles' nearby, commemorates the events. It is claimed, notably in the early part of the novel 'The Negotiator' by Frederick Forsyth, that the scorch marks from the flames can still be seen on the doors of Balliol College (now rehung between the Front Quadrangle and Garden Quadrangle).

 

University of Oxford ex Wiki  
The University of Oxford (legally The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford) is a collegiate research university in Oxford, England. There is evidence of teaching as early as 1096,[2] making it the oldest university in the English-speaking world and the world's second-oldest university in continuous operation.[2][10] It grew rapidly from 1167 when Henry II banned English students from attending the University of Paris.[2] After disputes between students and Oxford townsfolk in 1209, some academics fled north-east to Cambridge where they established what became the University of Cambridge.[11] The two "ancient universities" are frequently jointly called "Oxbridge". The history and influence of the University of Oxford have made it one of the most prestigious universities in the world.[12][13]

The university is made up of 39 constituent colleges, six permanent private halls, and a range of academic departments which are organised into four divisions.[14] All the colleges are self-governing institutions within the university, each controlling its own membership and with its own internal structure and activities.[15] It does not have a main campus, and its buildings and facilities are scattered throughout the city centre. Undergraduate teaching at Oxford is organised around weekly tutorials at the colleges and halls, supported by classes, lectures, seminars, and laboratory work provided by university faculties and departments; some postgraduate teaching, and occasionally undergraduate teaching, includes tutorials organised by faculties and departments. It operates the world's oldest university museum, as well as the largest university press in the world[16] and the largest academic library system nationwide.[17]

In the fiscal year ending 31 July 2019, the university had a total income of £2.45 billion, of which £624.8 million was from research grants and contracts.[3] The university is ranked among the best higher learning institutions by most international and major national league tables.[18][19][20]

Oxford has educated a wide range of notable alumni, including 28 prime ministers of the United Kingdom and many heads of state and government around the world.[21] As of November 2019, 72 Nobel Prize laureates, 3 Fields Medalists, and 6 Turing Award winners have studied, worked, or held visiting fellowships at the University of Oxford, while its alumni have won 160 Olympic medals.[22] Oxford is the home of numerous scholarships, including the Rhodes Scholarship, one of the oldest international graduate scholarship programmes.[23]

 

William Tyndale ex Wiki   
William Tyndale ( c. 1494c. 6 October 1536) was an English scholar who became a leading figure in the Protestant Reformation in the years leading up to his execution. He is well known for his (incomplete) translation of the Bible into English, influenced by the work of Erasmus of Rotterdam and of Martin Luther.[2]

A number of partial English translations had been made from the seventh century onward, but the religious ferment caused by Wycliffe's Bible in the late 14th century led to the death penalty for anyone found in unlicensed possession of Scripture in English, although translations were available in all other major European languages.[3]

Tyndale worked during a Renaissance of scholarship, which saw the publication of Reuchlin's Hebrew grammar 1506. Greek was available to the European scholarly community for the first time in centuries, as it welcomed Greek-speaking intellectuals and texts following the fall of Constantinople in 1453. Notably, Erasmus compiled, edited, and published the Greek Scriptures in 1516. Luther's German Bible appeared in 1522.

Tyndale's translation was the first English Bible to draw directly from Hebrew and Greek texts, the first English translation to take advantage of the printing press, the first of the new English Bibles of the Reformation, and the first English translation to use Jehovah ("Iehouah") as God's name as preferred by English Protestant Reformers.[a] It was taken to be a direct challenge to the hegemony of both the Catholic Church and the laws of England maintaining the church's position.

A copy of Tyndale's The Obedience of a Christian Man (1528), which argued that the king of a country should be the head of that country's church rather than the pope, fell into the hands of the English king Henry VIII, providing a rationale to break the Church in England from the Catholic Church in 1534.[4][5] Before this, in 1530, Tyndale wrote The Practyse of Prelates, opposing Henry's annulment of his own marriage on the grounds that it contravened Scripture.[6]

Fleeing England, Tyndale sought refuge in the Flemish territory of the Catholic Emperor Charles V. In 1535, Tyndale was arrested and jailed in the castle of Vilvoorde (Filford) outside Brussels for over a year. In 1536, he was convicted of heresy and executed by strangulation, after which his body was burnt at the stake. His dying prayer was that the King of England's eyes would be opened; this seemed to find its fulfillment just one year later with Henry's authorisation of the Matthew Bible, which was largely Tyndale's own work, with missing sections translated by John Rogers and Miles Coverdale.

Tyndale's translation of the Bible was plagarized for subsequent English translations, including the Great Bible and the Bishop's Bible, authorised by the church of England. In 1611, the 47 scholars who produced the King James Bible[7] drew significantly from Tyndale's original work and the other translations that descended from his.[8] One estimate suggests that the New Testament in the King James Version is 83% Tyndale's words, and the Old Testament 76%.[9][10] Hence, the work of Tyndale continued to play a key role in spreading Reformation ideas across the English-speaking world, and eventually across the British Empire. In 2002, Tyndale was placed 26th in the BBC's poll of the 100 Greatest Britons.[11][12]

 

Mob Psychology ex Wiki
Crowd psychology, also known as mob psychology, is a branch of social psychology. Social psychologists have developed several theories for explaining the ways in which the psychology of a crowd differs from and interacts with that of the individuals within it. Major theorists in crowd psychology include Gustave Le Bon, Gabriel Tarde, Sigmund Freud, and Steve Reicher. This field relates to the behaviors and thought processes of both the individual crowd members and the crowd as an entity.[1] Crowd behavior is heavily influenced by the loss of responsibility of the individual and the impression of universality of behavior, both of which increase with crowd size.[2][3]

Origins
The psychological study of crowd phenomena was documented decades prior to 1900, as European culture was imbued with thoughts of the fin de siècle. This "modern" urban culture perceived that they were living in a new and different age. They witnessed marvelous new inventions and experienced life in new ways. The population, now living in densely packed, industrialized cities, such as Milan and Paris, witnessed the development of the light bulb, radio, photography, moving-picture shows, the telegraph, the bicycle, the telephone, and the railroad system. They experienced a faster pace of life and viewed human life as segmented, so they designated each of these phases of life with a new name. They created new concepts like "the adolescent", "kindergarten", "the vacation", "camping in nature", "the 5-minute segment", and "travel for the sake of pleasure" as a leisure class to describe these new ways of life..............

The first debate in crowd psychology began in Rome at the first International Congress of Criminal Anthropology on 16 November 1885. The meeting was dominated by Cesare Lombroso and his fellow Italians, who emphasized the biological determinates..............

Literature on crowds and crowd behavior appeared as early as 1841, with the publication of Charles Mackay's book Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds.[8] [ Rather good - Editor ]. The attitude towards crowds underwent an adjustment with the publication of Hippolyte Taine's six-volume The Origins of Contemporary France (1875). In particular Taine's work helped to change the opinions of his contemporaries on the actions taken by the crowds during the 1789 Revolution.

Sigmund Freud's crowd behavior theory primarily consists of the idea that becoming a member of a crowd serves to unlock the unconscious mind. This occurs because the super-ego, or moral center of consciousness, is displaced by the larger crowd, to be replaced by a charismatic crowd leader. McDougall argues similarly to Freud, saying that simplistic emotions are widespread, and complex emotions are rarer. In a crowd, the overall shared emotional experience reverts to the least common denominator (LCD), leading to primitive levels of emotional expression.[1] This organizational structure is that of the "primal horde" – pre-civilized society - and Freud states that one must rebel against the leader (re-instate the individual morality) in order to escape from it.[1] Moscovici expanded on this idea, discussing how dictators such as Mao Zedong and Joseph Stalin have used mass psychology to place themselves in this "horde leader" position.[10]

Theodor Adorno criticized the belief in a spontaneity of the masses: according to him, the masses were an artificial product of "administrated" modern life. The Ego of the bourgeois subject dissolved itself, giving way to the Id and the "de-psychologized" subject. Furthermore, Adorno stated the bond linking the masses to the leader through the spectacle is feigned:

"When the leaders become conscious of mass psychology and take it into their own hands, it ceases to exist in a certain sense. ... Just as little as people believe in the depth of their hearts that the Jews are the devil, do they completely believe in their leader. They do not really identify themselves with him but act this identification, perform their own enthusiasm, and thus participate in their leader's performance. ... It is probably the suspicion of this fictitiousness of their own 'group psychology' which makes fascist crowds so merciless and unapproachable. If they would stop to reason for a second, the whole performance would go to pieces, and they would be left to panic."[15]

 

Herd Mentality ex Wiki
Herd mentality, mob mentality and pack mentality, also lesser known as gang mentality, describes how people can be influenced by their peers to adopt certain behaviors on a largely emotional, rather than rational, basis. When individuals are affected by mob mentality, they may make different decisions than they would have individually.

Social psychologists study the related topics of group intelligence, crowd wisdom, groupthink, deindividuation, and decentralized decision making.

History
The idea of a "group mind" or "mob behavior" was first put forward by 19th-century French social psychologists Gabriel Tarde and Gustave Le Bon. Herd behavior in human societies has also been studied by Sigmund Freud and Wilfred Trotter, whose book Instincts of the Herd in Peace and War is a classic in the field of social psychology. Sociologist and economist Thorstein Veblen's The Theory of the Leisure Class illustrates how individuals imitate other group members of higher social status in their consumer behavior. More recently, Malcolm Gladwell in The Tipping Point, examines how cultural, social, and economic factors converge to create trends in consumer behavior. In 2004, the New Yorker's financial columnist James Suroweicki published The Wisdom of Crowds.

Twenty-first-century academic fields such as marketing and behavioral finance attempt to identify and predict the rational and irrational behavior of investors. (See the work of Daniel Kahneman [ See Thinking Fast and Slow - Ed. ], Robert Shiller, Vernon L. Smith, and Amos Tversky.) Driven by emotional reactions such as greed and fear, investors can be seen to join in frantic purchasing and sales of stocks, creating bubbles and crashes. As a result, herd behavior is closely studied by behavioral finance experts in order to help predict future economic crises.[1]

 

Edward Bernays ex Wiki
Edward Louis Bernays (/bərˈnz/; German: [bɛɐ̯ˈnaɪs]; November 22, 1891 − March 9, 1995) was an Austrian-American pioneer in the field of public relations and propaganda, referred to in his obituary as "the father of public relations".[3] Bernays was named one of the 100 most influential Americans of the 20th century by Life.[4] He was the subject of a full length biography by Larry Tye called The Father of Spin (1999) and later an award-winning 2002 documentary for the BBC by Adam Curtis called The Century of the Self.

His best-known campaigns include a 1929 effort to promote female smoking by branding cigarettes as feminist "Torches of Freedom" and his work for the United Fruit Company connected with the CIA-orchestrated overthrow of the democratically elected Guatemalan government in 1954. He worked for dozens of major American corporations including Procter & Gamble and General Electric, and for government agencies, politicians, and non-profit organizations.

Of his many books, Crystallizing Public Opinion (1923) and Propaganda (1928) gained special attention as early efforts to define and theorize the field of public relations. Citing works of writers such as Gustave Le Bon, Wilfred Trotter, Walter Lippmann, and Sigmund Freud (his own double uncle), he described the masses as irrational and subject to herd instinct—and outlined how skilled practitioners could use crowd psychology and psychoanalysis to control them in desirable ways.[5][6]

 

Intellectuals Are Slobs

That is not quite the point of this article; it leads into a review of a book by a rather sound sort of chap. None the less the point is made and well sourced.

Edmund Connelly
QUOTE
In 1989, prolific British [ English in fact ] writer Paul Johnson published Intellectuals offering case studies of a string of intellectuals, beginning with Jean-Jacques Rousseau and then Shelley, Marx, Ibsen, Tolstoy, Hemingway,  Bertold Brecht [ swine extraordinaire ], Bertrand Russell, Sartre, right on down to more modern public thinkers. Johnson’s point is that however much these men (and Lillian Hellman) might have professed love of “humanity” and “progress,” they were rats to the actual people around them.

For example, Johnson wrote of the poet Shelley:

Any moth than came near his fierce flame was  singed. His first wife, Harriet, and his mistress, Fay Godwin, both committed suicide when he deserted them. In his letters he denounced their actions roundly for causing him distress and inconvenience. . . .  His children by Harriet were made wards of the court. He erased them completely from his mind, and they never received  a  single word from their father. Another child, a bastard, died in  a  Naples foundling hospital where he had abandoned her.

Of Karl Marx, the self-professed savior of the working man, Johnson wrote: He seduced his wife’s servant, begot a son by her [ Confirmed at Citizendium ], then forced Friedrich Engels to assume paternity. Marx’s daughter Eleanor once let out a cri de coeur in a letter: “Is it not wonderful, when you come to look things squarely in the face, how rarely we  seem to practice all the fine things we  preach—to others?” She later committed suicide.

Johnson concluded that we must “Beware intellectuals.” “Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.”
UNQUOTE
At least some of these accusations are true.

 


 

England's Leading Intellectuals Betray England   [ 16 July 2020 ]
QUOTE
Late in life I came to realise the value of not sweating the small stuff. No point in getting into a state over trivial annoyances. Reinhold Niebuhr had an even more profound insight: God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference. Genuinely, such an invocation does help you get through life in a less stressful way.

I try live by these precepts. But sometimes it ain't easy. Very many years ago I fell in love with Jesus College, Cambridge. The ambiance, the grounds, the stately buildings and echoing corridors. I'd love to have had an academic position there but despite having a PhD, a Post-Doctoral Fellowship and published a high-selling book in my field I wouldn't have had a chance. Only the best of the best of the best are awarded a tenured professorship at Cambridge. And that's after surviving the fabled back-stabbing of academic politics where lifelong friendships are transformed into lifelong enmities in the vicious squabble for spoils. Little wonder then that the dons, once ensconced, become bywords for arrogance and their fanatical defence of their academic independence.

You can imagine therefore what it takes to become the Master Of Jesus College Cambridge. 

Unless you're Sonita Alleyne who washed up in Britain from Barbados about 50 years ago. She  eventually got a pass BA - be assured it was not in astrophysics - after which she started a 'music publicity company'. And that's the extent of her achievements. But, as I've always said, if you're black, are not in jail and wear business clothes the world is your oyster. Alleyne's pass BA and involvement with a small publicity company propelled her to unimaginable heights with a Fellowship of the Royal Society Of Arts and appointments to, inter alia, the Court of Governors at London's University Of Arts and the BBC Trust (Governing Body). And now she's Master of Jesus College Cambridge. Never published an academic paper, undertaken a research project or even taught students. And she's now setting the academic direction for one of the world's most prestigious Colleges. Alumni such as Thomas Cranmer, Samuel Taylor Coleridge and Thomas Malthus must be spinning in their graves.

Now you'd imagine that having been parachuted in the most bizarre way into such a position Alleyne would keep her head down, cringing with embarrassment when chairing a meeting of intellectual powerhouses. Not a bit of it! Since her appointment she's spent her time haranguing academic staff and the general public on the terrible bigotry that blacks labour under. On June 5th she published a message on the College web site: Yup, you've guessed it. George Floyd. "If one man can't breathe none of us can breathe" (an assertion disprovable by a child) adding "Be angry at this moment". When someone pointed out that June 5 was also the 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre Allenye was not pleased. According to The Spectator 'she has  forbidden the dons from speaking about the College's relationship with China' (my emphasis). Forbidden the dons! Oh deary deary me. I suppose only an affirmative action nonentity utterly tone deaf to university practices and traditions could come out with something like that...........

I marvel at the treachery of Britain's ruling class (I'm not referring just to the aristocracy here). They have sold out a glorious heritage, handing it over to unworthy and ungrateful foreigners who have no claim to it. Will some traveller in the distant future echo the words of Horace Smith as he surveys the impending wreckage?

What powerful but unrecorded race 
Once dwelt in that annihilated place?

UNQUOTE
You can see what the Irish Savant is so very annoyed about. If you can't or won't, you are part of the problem. To be fair the other lot, the Oxford mob also have a track record of being dangerous fools led by Mob Psychology and cunning rogues. In 1555 AD they captured the Archbishop of Canterbury, tried him as a heretic then burnt him at the stake. The current bunch of Quasi-Intellectuals regard him as a fool in a frock with a silly hat. See e.g. the Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Oxford

Alleyne looking stupid and ugly - Racist as well naturally.
PS It seems that pretentious twerps at Jesus College admire  the Chinese Communist Party - see  What is Dominic Raab not telling us about Hong Kong on the point.

 

 

 
Email me at Mike Emery.

If you want to keep it private, use my PGP Key.

Updated on  Sunday, 23 August 2020 20:28:54 +0300