911 Twenty Years Later

I wrote about the 9/11 job in 2001,soon after the event. My essay is at The 9/11 Job Then. Now, twenty years later it still sounds about right. Other people have done recent analyses and come down firmly on the perpetrators. Yes, it was set up by Jews, by Zionist crazies to leverage the American public and political parties into waging war for Israel, the Stolen Land.

No, it was not set up by a man with a silly hat living in a cave in the Hindu Kush. In fact Osama bin Laden or, at least his family were friends of the Bush tribe. The bin Laden lot were big in building. Bush et al were Oil men. This aspect is something of a Red Herring.

One fact beyond debate, accepted however reluctantly by all is that the Dancing Jews were there to record the attack for posterity and Mossad. They KNEW it was going to happen. Absolute proof of guilt? You might think so. Another fact is that the BBC reported the collapse of Building 7 some 20 minutes before it happened. They then destroyed the evidence and denied everything. That was not part of the script as written.

The war caused by Jews was the invasion of Afghanistan, war that lasted just short of a full twenty years. That is how Zionists wanted it; that is how they got it. Thousands died, millions were destroyed at a cost of some $2.2 TRILLION, that is $2.2 thousand billion. Do they care? No!

Joe Biden pulled the men out. It was the right move for the wrong reasons. The American High Command was outraged. Its chairman especially so. They should all have been court martialled and shot or given LWOP [ life without parole ] in GITMO. The Merchants of Death are not pleased but they have not been so noisy. The Jews have pretended innocence while being guilty as Hell; SOP [ Standard Operating Procedure ]

Here are some recent sources:-
Ron Unz is a sound chap with a background in theoretical physics. Laurent Guyénot writes about Conspiracy Theories. He comes down firmly on Mossad and its henchmen. Paul Craig Roberts is thoroughly sensible; he was in politics, in the Belly of the Beast. He knows of what he speaks. The rest of Ron's Authors agree in essence. Or look at Out-Thought, Out-Bought, Out-Fought: Why the "9/11 Truth" Movement Failed

 

Seeking 911 Truth After Twenty Years, by Ron Unz
QUOTE
The twentieth anniversary of the 9/11 Attacks is almost upon us, and although their immediacy has been somewhat reduced by the events of the last eighteen months, we must recognize that they have drastically shaped the world history of the last two decades, greatly changing the daily lives and liberties of most ordinary Americans.

The widespread doubts about the reality of the official story provided by our government and almost universally promoted by our media has severely diminished popular faith in the credibility of those two crucial institutions, with consequences that are still very apparent in today’s highest profile issues.

Over the years, diligent researchers and courageous journalists have largely demolished the original narrative of those events, and have made a strong, perhaps even overwhelming case that the Israeli Mossad together with its American collaborators played the central role. My own reconstruction, substantially relying upon such accumulated evidence, came to such conclusions, and I am therefore republishing it below, drawn from my previous articles which had appeared in late 2018 and early 2020, with the later material making heavy use of Ronen Bergman’s authoritative 2018 history of the Mossad, which ran more than 750 pages.

Immediately following my own analysis is a link to a particularly noteworthy article along the same lines by French writer Laurent Guyénot, which we had originally released simultaneously with my own, then followed by more than a dozen other significant articles of the previous decade, all published or republished on this website. In coming days, some of these may also be separately featured as part of the twenty-year commemoration.

The 9/11 Attacks – What Happened?

Although somewhat related, political assassinations and terrorist attacks are distinct topics, and Bergman’s comprehensive volume explicitly focuses on the former, so we cannot fault him for providing only slight coverage of the latter. But the historical pattern of Israeli activity, especially with regard to false-flag attacks, is really quite remarkable, as I noted in a 2018 article:

One of history’s largest terrorist attacks prior to 9/11 was the 1946 bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem by Zionist militants dressed as Arabs, which killed 91 people and largely destroyed the structure. In the famous Lavon Affair of 1954, Israeli agents launched a wave of terrorist attacks against Western targets in Egypt, intending to have those blamed on anti-Western Arab groups. There are strong claims that in 1950 Israeli Mossad agents began a series of false-flag terrorist bombings against Jewish targets in Baghdad, successfully using those violent methods to help persuade Iraq’s thousand-year-old Jewish community to emigrate to the Jewish state. In 1967, Israel launched a deliberate air and sea attack against the U.S.S. Liberty, intending to leave no survivors, killing or wounding over 200 American servicemen before word of the attack reached our Sixth Fleet and the Israelis withdrew.

The enormous extent of pro-Israel influence in world political and media circles meant that none of these brutal attacks ever drew serious retaliation, and in nearly all cases, they were quickly thrown down the memory hole, so that today probably no more than one in a hundred Americans is even aware of them. Furthermore, most of these incidents came to light due to chance circumstances, so we may easily suspect that many other attacks of a similar nature have never become part of the historical record.

Of these famous incidents, Bergman only includes mention of the King David Hotel bombing. But much later in his narrative, he describes the huge wave of false-flag terrorist attacks unleashed in 1981 by Israeli Defense Minister Ariel Sharon, who recruited a former high-ranking Mossad official to manage the project................

However, by the end of 2008 my focus had begun to change. Bush was leaving office without having started an Iranian war, and America had successfully dodged the bullet of an even more dangerous John McCain administration. I assumed that Barack Obama would be a terrible president and he proved worse than my expectations, but I still breathed a huge sigh of relief every day that he was in the White House.

Moreover, around that same time I’d stumbled across an astonishing detail of the 9/11 attacks that demonstrated the remarkable depths of my own ignorance. In a Counterpunch article, I’d discovered that immediately following the attacks, the supposed terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden had publicly denied any involvement, even declaring that no good Muslim would have committed such deeds.

Once I checked around a little and fully confirmed that fact, I was flabbergasted. 9/11 was not only the most successful terrorist attack in the history of the world, but may have been greater in its physical magnitude than all past terrorist operations combined. The entire purpose of terrorism is to allow a small organization to show the world that it can inflict serious losses upon a powerful state, and I had never previously heard of any terrorist leader denying his role in a successful operation, let alone the greatest in history. Something seemed extremely wrong in the media-generated narrative that I had previously accepted. I began to wonder if I had been as deluded as the tens of millions of Americans in 2003 and 2004 who naively believed that Saddam had been the mastermind behind the September 11th attacks. We live in a world of illusions generated by our media, and I suddenly felt that I had noticed a tear in the papier-mâché mountains displayed in the background of a Hollywood sound-stage. If Osama was probably not the author of 9/11, what other huge falsehoods had I blindly accepted?...............................

The 9/11 Attacks – Who Did It?

Let us now suppose that the overwhelming weight of evidence is correct, and concur with high-ranking former CIA intelligence analysts, distinguished academics, and experienced professionals that the 9/11 attacks were not what they appeared to be. We recognize the extreme implausibility that three huge skyscrapers in New York City suddenly collapsed at free-fall velocity into their own footprints after just two of them were hit by airplanes, and also that a large civilian jetliner probably did not strike the Pentagon leaving behind absolutely no wreckage and only a small hole. What actually did happen, and more importantly, who was responsible?

The first question is obviously impossible to answer without an honest and thorough official investigation of the evidence. Until that occurs, we should not be surprised that numerous, somewhat conflicting hypotheses have been advanced and debated within the confines of the 9/11 Truth community. But the second question is probably the more important and relevant one, and I think it has always represented a source of extreme vulnerability to 9/11 Truthers.

[ Ron continues ]
UNQUOTE
Ron Unz is a Jew with a background in theoretical physics. His MSc proves his intelligence. He, as usual he approaches the matter as a researcher, admitting that he just does not know but assessing the evidence calmly & honestly. That is as good as it gets in a wicked world. The comments are largely sensible, often well informed. Believe him? I do.

 

Related Reading:

 

The 9/11 Job Then

The 9/11 Job is rather like the Dallas Job. We know that they happened. Somebody wanted Kennedy sorted out. We know that the investigations were wrong. After that the game is wide open. Who did it and why? Those are the main questions for researchers. The American government is a candidate in Dallas and Mossad is a strong candidate in New York. Recent [ September 2015 ] commentary comes from Doctor Roberts, a distinguished economist & one time politician at 911 Fourteen Years Later. Alex Jones puts a view at https://freedocumentaries.org/documentary/terrorstorm-a-history-of-government-sponsored-terrorism#watch-trailer but, in fact 9/11 Was an Israeli Job.

The perpetrators were Arabs, mainly from Saudi Arabia. We do not know who ran them, their handlers but they were the final layer in the Chain of Command that came from the master criminals. Who are they? We have no direct evidence but we do know more. The Dancing Jews were there because it was known that the attacks were going to happen on that day, in that place. The chain of command in their case was much shorter because they were working for Mossad or, just possibly other vicious Zionist crazies. This makes it reasonable to believe that the 9/11 Job was set up by Jews and the American Deep State.

What were their motives? Senior American military officers got an excuse to wage war in Afghanistan while McDonnell Douglas got more contracts for overpriced high tech munitions. The Jews demonstrated their power in the Middle East.

How were three building dropped? Conventional explosives carefully placed would have worked but made too much noise. The answer is to use #Nano-thermite,  extremely finely ground powder to burn hotter and faster than normal thermite. Wikispooks explains. It is less known than the Wikileaks but this particular article reads as sensible & competent. Linking to sources of evidence makes claims checkable.

Here are some offerings:-

The 9/11 Job

 

36 MSM Voices Reported Explosions on 9/11     
Reporters actually saw what happened or not. They reported direct eyewitnesses or not. Others were more remote. Most if not all were flying blind, without previous knowledge Off-Guardian looks at reports of explosions as distinct from aircraft collisions.

 

The 911 Report - http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report.pdf
Is it worth looking at except to find the lies, perversions and omissions? Probably not. There is no mention of Building 7 or the Dancing Jews so it was a cover up.

 

The /9/11 Commission Report ex Wiki       
The Wiki summarizes; it saves wasting time on the actual thing.

 

The Myth Of The Innocent Civilian
Michael Santomauro
tells us about people's attitudes on 9/11. In summary:-
Jews - smug about their achievement
Blacks - delighted.
Islamics - alarmed about possible backlash
Main Stream Media - pretending to be upset but pleased
White People - upset or wanting to forget it.

 

Louis Farrakhan Explains 911 Job  
The Honourable Minister Louis Farrakhan says it was Jews. The [ all black ] audience lap it up. This not to imply that he was wrong.

 

9-11 Was Good For Israel
Says Benjamin Netanyahu. On this point he is not lying.

 

9-11 Twelve Years Later
The response to the attack was to lie about it, to claim that Islam had nothing to do with it, to allege that Islam  Is A Religion of  Peace, to pander to Islamics who incite hatred of the West. Following it with witless war on Afghanistan, killing thousands, costing billions or trillions proves lunacy, conspiracy, rampant evil or some combination.

 

911  Who Did it?    
We are not sure but it was not Arab amateurs.

 

911 Comment
Take this at face value or not.

 

The Osama bin Laden Myth
Osama said at length, in detail that he did not do it. The American media concealed this interesting fact. Why? Because it spoilt their excuse for invading Afghanistan. There may have been other reasons too.

 

The 11th Anniversary Of 911  - http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/09/11/the-11th-anniversary-911-paul-craig-roberts/
Paul Roberts publishes a powerful article from 9/11 researchers. It was an inside job.

 

http://www.infowars.com/everything-you-ever-wanted-to-know-about-911-conspiracy-theory-in-under-5-minutes/
A good summary.

 

Dancing Jews
The dancing Jews were there to watch the 9/11 Job. The dancing Jews knew it was going to happen. The  Wikipedia pretends that the dancing Jews do not exist. The Main Stream Media pretended that Obama was born in Hawaii; that he was not using a Forged Birth Certificate. The Main Stream Media are  propaganda machines. The Wikipedia  is too.

 

Building 7 Was Dropped Without Using An Aircraft
How did they do it? What do they blame? Why did the BBC tell us about it about 23 minutes before it happened?

 

9/11 Proved Four Times That Airport Security Is Worthless
QUOTE
We have learned today that airport security is not the answer. At least four separate terror teams were able to sail right past all the elaborate obstacles � the demand for IDs, the metal detectors, the video cameras, the X-ray machines, the gunpowder sniffers, the gate agents and security people trained to spot terrorists by profile. There have been no reports that any other terror units were successfully prevented from achieving their objectives by these measures. In fact, the early evidence is that all these police-state-like impositions on freedom were exactly useless � and in the smouldering ruins of the World Trade Centre lies the proof of their failure.

We have learned today that increased surveillance is not the answer. The FBI's "Carnivore" tap on the U.S.'s Internet service providers didn't spot or prevent this disaster; nor did the NSA's illegal Echelon wiretaps on international telecommunications. Video monitoring of public areas could have accomplished exactly nothing against terrorists taking even elementary concealment measures. If we could somehow extend airport-level security to the entire U.S., it would be just as useless against any determined and even marginally competent enemy......

Perhaps it is too much to hope that we will respond to this shattering tragedy as well as the Israelis, who have a long history of preventing similar atrocities by encouraging their civilians to carry concealed weapons and to shoot back at criminals and terrorists. But it is in that policy of a distributed response to a distributed threat, with every single citizen taking personal responsibility for the defence of life and freedom, that our best hope for preventing recurrences of today' mass murders almost certainly lies.
UNQUOTE
This was written on the day and ignored thereafter. Billions have been wasted on a useless industry selling high tech machines that work but only at demonstrations.

 

911 Cover Up By NIST
QUOTE
NIST (National Institute for Standards and Technology) was given a budget of tens of millions of dollars to study the collapses of the World Trade Centre skyscrapers. Yet it avoided that charge in any meaningful sense. Its final report admits that it didn't even attempt to model the collapses.

The first critique to thoroughly expose NIST's evasion of its task of investigating the collapses was provided by Sami Yli-Karjanmaa on July 14, 2005.
UNQUOTE
Believe nothing until it is officially denied.

 

9/11 - The Aftermath
There was an aftermath. 3,000 families bereaved was only part of it. 9/11 became an excuse to impose grossly bad law on Americans and invade Iraq. These may well have been the reasons. See America as a Fascist State

 

911 Conspiracy Theories Debunked
Read for yourself. Think for yourself. Decide for yourself. There might be people who swallow it.

 

9/11 Fairy Story
A good summary of the evidence. See page 13 regarding the fighter intercepts that did not happen and why. To be fair this article was publicised by jetson55 <jw3999@gmail.com in Message-ID: <71ae505e-aeda-49ea-89a0-50e7153633b2@p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> which came in for robust criticism. More and better details at http://tyrannyalert.com/800.html.

 

9/11 Looking for Truth in Credentials
Getting answers from experts makes sense until you look at their provenance. Someone who gets big government contracts is going to toe the party line.

 

9/11 NORAD Stand-Down
NORAD was not merely idle on parade. NORAD was making it easy for them. One version says that there was an exercise going on the time which confused the issue.

 

911 Questioned Again
Jesse Ventura asks the right questions. So do other men with the right background.

 

9/11 - Who Did It?
Gives some of the questions and some opinions.

 

BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Early
QUOTE
BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell WTC 7 still standing in background, Google removes clip...
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 (UPDATED 5:36AM CST)
RELATED: BBC Responds to Building 7 Controversy; Claim 9/11 Tapes Lost
RELATED: Time Stamp Confirms BBC Reported WTC 7 Collapse 26 Minutes In Advance
RELATED: After This Fiasco, How Can We Trust Anything They Told Us About 9/11?
An astounding video uncovered from the archives today shows the BBC reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. The incredible footage shows BBC reporter Jane Standley talking about the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building while it remains standing in the live shot behind her head. Minutes before the actual collapse of the building is due, the feed to the reporter mysteriously dies..........

In a September 2002 PBS documentary, the owner of the WTC complex Larry Silverstein discusses Building 7 and states that in the late afternoon of September 11, the decision was made to "pull it." The term "pull it" is industry jargon for controlled demolition, but Silverstein denied charges that WTC 7 had been deliberately brought down.
UNQUOTE
You don't have to believe that the BBC is bent as a nine bob note - but it helps. You don't have to believe that 9/11 was an inside job - but it helps.

 

Controlled Demolition Or Other Causes?
Look for yourself. Think for yourself. Decide for yourself.

 

Cui Bono - Who Benefits?

Silberstein said Pull It. Silberstein got away with it. Silberstein is a Jew.

 

Flight 77 And The Pentagon
The Pentagon was hit by a missile NOT a civil airliner. The evidence is incontrovertible.

Highly Credible People Question 9/11 Job
Making it onto this list means being a lieutenant colonel as a minimum.

 

Nano-thermite      
Nano-thermite
or super-thermite is a metastable intermolecular composite (MICs) characterized by a particle size of its main constituents, a metal and a metal oxide, under 100 nanometers. This allows for high and customizable reaction rates. Nano-thermites contain an oxidizer and a reducing agent, which are intimately mixed on the nanometer scale. MICs, including nano-thermitic materials, are a type of reactive materials investigated for military use, as well as for general applications involving propellants, explosives, and pyrotechnics.

What distinguishes MICs from traditional thermites is that the oxidizer and a reducing agent, normally iron oxide and aluminium, are in the form of extremely fine powders (nanoparticles). This dramatically increases the reactivity relative to micrometre-sized powder thermite. As the mass transport mechanisms that slow down the burning rates of traditional thermites are not so important at these scales, the reaction proceeds much more quickly.

 

Pilots For 9/11 Truth
Men in the business say the government is lying. Does it ever do anything else?

 

Vicsims - Simulated Victims
Somebody else believes we are being lied to big time. Somebody else is right on the basic point. For the rest? Read for yourself. Think for yourself. Decide for yourself.

 

Silverstein Sues for $12.3 Billion in 9/11 ‘Damages’ [ 29 March 2008 ]
QUOTE
Source -  NY Times | March 27, 2008
Larry A. Silverstein, who has won nearly $4.6 billion in insurance payments to cover his losses and help him rebuild at the World Trade Centre site, is seeking $12.3 billion in damages from airlines and airport security companies for the 9/11 attack.

Mr. Silverstein, the developer of ground zero, sought the damages, whose amount was not previously known, in a claim filed in 2004, that says the airlines and airport security companies failed to prevent terrorists from hijacking the planes used to destroy the buildings. His case was consolidated last week with similar, earlier lawsuits brought by families of some victims of the attack and by other property owners. But in seeking $12.3 billion, he is by far the biggest claimant in the litigation.
UNQUOTE
When it comes to unmitigated greed it is hard to beat a Jewish chancer on the make. He claimed two pay outs from his insurers on the spurious grounds that there were two attacks. He wouldn't have gotten away with it in English law. Trying to get three times as much again has nothing to do with his losses.

 

Afghanistan Invasion Explained - It's Oil [ 12 July 2009 ]
QUOTE
    The second option is to build a pipeline south from Central Asia to the Indian Ocean. One obvious route south would cross Iran, but this is foreclosed for American companies because of U.S. sanctions legislation. The only other possible route is across Afghanistan, which has of course its own unique challenges. The country has been involved in bitter warfare for almost two decades, and is still divided by civil war. From the outset, we have made it clear that construction of the pipeline we have proposed across Afghanistan could not begin until a recognized government is in place that has the confidence of governments, lenders, and our company..........

    Unocal foresees a pipeline which would become part of a regional system that will gather oil from existing pipeline infrastructure in Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Russia. The 1,040-mile long oil pipeline would extend south through Afghanistan to an export terminal that would be constructed on the Pakistan coast. This 42-inch diameter pipeline will have a shipping capacity of one million barrels of oil per day. The estimated cost of the project, which is similar in scope to the trans-Alaska pipeline, is about $2.5 billion........

    Last October, the Central Asia Gas Pipeline Consortium, called CentGas, in which Unocal holds an interest, was formed to develop a gas pipeline which will link Turkmenistan's vast Dauletabad gas field with markets in Pakistan and possibly India. The proposed 790-mile pipeline will open up new markets for this gas, travelling from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to Multan in Pakistan. The proposed extension would move gas on to New Delhi, where it would connect with an existing pipeline. As with the proposed Central Asia oil pipeline, CentGas can not begin construction until an internationally recognized Afghanistan Government is in place.
UNQUOTE
This evidence was given to the American Congress back in 1998. The 9/11 Job was just an excuse.

 

 

911 Job - Rumsfeld Told The Truth - By Accident [ 12th May 2009 ]
QUOTE
May 10, 2009
Mr. Richard B. Cheney
Mr. Donald H. Rumsfeld
Dear Dick and Don:
Millions of people have reached the conclusion that the official account of 9/11 is actually a deception of monumental proportions. Instead of believing that the Pentagon was struck by a commercial airliner, that United Airlines Flight 93 crashed in Pennsylvania, and that three skyscrapers within the World Trade Centre collapsed after being struck by two airliners, they say the evidence shows that the Pentagon was struck by a missile (or something other than a commercial airliner), that Flight 93 was shot down over Pennsylvania, and that the World Trade Centre buildings were blown up..............

On October 12, 2001, you, Don, told Parade magazine in an interview at the Pentagon that the terrorists had used  "a missile to damage this building" (http://www.defenselink.mil/transcript s/transcript.aspx?TranscriptID=3845)...... On December 27, 2004, you again, Don, said that the terrorists had �shot down the plane over Pennsylvania� (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6Xoxaf1Al0 ). And just today, on CBS "Face the Nation", you, Dick, said to Bob Schieffer that we must not forget that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was the man who "blew up the World Trade Centre" on 9/11 (http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5004452n � at about 7:47 � 8:00). So let's get this straight. According to your own statements, the Pentagon was struck by a missile, Flight 93 was shot down over Pennsylvania, and the World Trade Centre buildings were blown up.
UNQUOTE
If politicians don't remember which lie to tell and when they can get into difficulties. Fortunately the main stream media will give them a pass - as long as they pander to people who really matter.

 

A Full El Al Flight Took Off On 9-11 From JFK To Tel Aviv [ 16 March 2010 ]
QUOTE
Wayne Madsen
WMR has learned from two El Al sources who worked for the Israeli airline at New York's John F. Kennedy airport that on 9/11, hours after the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) grounded all civilian domestic and international incoming and outgoing flights to and from the United States, a full El Al Boeing 747 took off from JFK bound for Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion International Airport. The two El Al employee sources are not Israeli nationals but legal immigrants from Ecuador who were working in the United States for the airline. The flight departed JFK at 4:11 pm and its departure was, according to the El Al sources, authorized by the direct intervention of the U.S. Department of Defence. U.S. military officials were on the scene at JFK and were personally involved with the airport and air traffic control authorities to clear the flight for take-off.........

The El Al flight took off two days before commercial flights were permitted to resume on September 13. Private flights were only permitted to resume on September 14. On September 13, a chartered Lear jet flew three Saudis, including a member of the Saudi royal family, from Tampa to Lexington, Kentucky. On September 14, a chartered Northstar Aviation flight flew four Saudis from Providence, Rhode Island to Paris.
UNQUOTE
Surprising? Yes but not very. Plausible? Yes. Credible? Yes. Wayne Madsen is fat, ugly,  ex-CIA analyst. He may well have good sources.

 

Anger Over Behaviour Of 9/11 Accused [ 7 May 2012 ]
QUOTE
9/11 families angered over behaviour of alleged plotters at Guantánamo hearing
Arraignment marked by near-farcical defiance sets stage for lengthy trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four co-defendents [ sic ]

Family members of those killed in the 9/11 attacks have expressed anger over displays of defiance shown by the alleged plotters during an arraignment hearing at Guant�namo Bay. The hearing, which was expected to last two hours, stretched to 13 hours as Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his four co-defendants refused to accept the start of trial proceedings in a controversial "military commission" inside the US naval base in Cuba. The hearing was marked by near-farcical scenes in which the defendants prayed, read the Economist, talked among each other and ignored the judicial events around them...........

One of the most contentious of those issues is torture. Defence lawyers at the arraignment attempted to raise the question but were slapped down by Pohl who said: "We'll get to it when I said we'll get to it". It is known that Mohammed alone was subjected to simulated drowning, or waterboarding, 183 times. Speaking after the arraignment, defence lawyer James Connell said the behaviour of the five defendants had amounted to "peaceful resistance to an unjust system". He said the scenes in the courtroom had demonstrated "that this will be a long hard-fought but peaceful struggle against secrecy, torture and the misguided institution of the military commissions".
UNQUOTE
The headline is verbatim and gross Propaganda from the Guardian. It does not bother to tell us that after Mr. Mohammed had been broken by CIA torturers he claimed that he had planned to attack a bank founded years after he was captured. See KSM Confessed To Attacking Bank Founded After His Arrest. This trial is following in the footsteps of the Nuremberg War Trials which were as the Lord Chief Justice of America said:- a high class lynching party. They used torture, suppression of evidence & perjury to enforce non-existent law.

That is the alleged perpetrator. Does he look like a criminal mastermind or a third rate taxi driver being thrown to the wolves?

 

9/11 - Who Did it
Conspiracy theories have attractions but some contradict each other. A lot are just silly. A few are rather better. Anyone who argues that governments are fools or rogues has a point. Of course some governments are worse than others.
PS It turns out that the American government under Bush has been the most grossly oppressive and authoritarian regime in America ever. Bush enacted the Military Commissions Act of 2006 which has given us America as a Fascist State 

The Osama bin Laden Myth
Osama said at length, in detail that he did not do it. The American media concealed this interesting fact. Why? Because it spoilt their excuse for invading Afghanistan. There may have been other reasons too.

 

http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/video_new_wtc_animation_wtc_core.htm
At the end of this animation is the evidence that charges were used on the core of the towers:

Here is the pay off; an excuse to make America a slave state.

 

Who Done it? Not a Bunch of Arab Amateurs
Where was the wreckage? Nowhere. Therefore it wasn't aircraft. QED and this is from military pilots.

 

General Ivashov says that international terrorism does not exist
QUOTE
General Leonid Ivashov was the Chief of Staff of the Russian armed forces when the September 11, 2001, attacks took place. This military man, who lived the events from the inside, offers an analysis which is very different to that of his American colleagues. As he did during the Axis for Peace 2005 conference, he now explains that international terrorism does not exist and that the September 11 attacks were the result of a set-up. What we are seeing is a manipulation by the big powers; this terrorism would not exist without them. He affirms that, instead of faking a “world war on terror”, the best way to reduce that kind of attacks is through respect for international law and peaceful cooperation among countries and their citizens.
UNQUOTE
There is a lot in his view but Colonel Putin of the KGB really knows who is guilty of terrorism. That is partly why he got to be the Prime Minister of Russia while the good general is on the retired list. In practice good intentions are not enough. There are hooligans out there. Look what Bush and Blair are doing to Iraq.

 

The David Kelly dead in the woods PSYOP [ 23 October 2006 ]
Doctor Kelly was murdered or committed suicide after being harassed by the light fingered bunch of rogues who are Her Majesty's Government. The cover up went in fast, very fast. Inquiries are conducted on particular terms written to avoid the truth or, at least get the required result. Now it looks as though one man's evidence was crucially wrong.

 

Skyscraper Burns. Skyscraper Does Not Collapse - Unlike 9-11 Job [ 11 March 2009 ]
QUOTE
Building burns for hours, does not collapse
A recently constructed, 44-story Beijing skyscraper was set ablaze the evening of Feb. 9, 2009. After becoming engulfed in flames in an impressive night time conflagration witnessed by thousands celebrating the Chinese New Year, the building remained standing with its steel-beam framework completely intact.

The building was designed by Dutch architect Rem Koolhaas as part of the Chinese government�s pre-2008 Olympics building spree and part of China Central Television (CCTV)�s new headquarters. The fact that it did not collapse is consistent with the burning of every steel-framed building in world history with the exception of the Twin Towers and WTC 7 in New York on Sept. 11, 2001.

The official cause of the fire, which began at approximately 7:45 p.m., was "an unauthorized fireworks display." The fire began at ground level and quickly worked its way up, consuming all 44 floors and shooting flames 30 feet past the top floor before going out several hours later.

By contrast, only a few small, smoky fires of inexplicable origin were seen on eight floors of WTC 7 for a few hours and then the building imploded, collapsing in its own footprint at freefall speed. 
UNQUOTE
This did not get a whole lot of publicity but then it was not part of an agenda. With the 9/11 Job you wonder whether it was conspiracy or cock up. Serious people have some difficult questions which the government has not even tried to answer.

 

Academics Question American Government Lies Over The 9/11 Job [ 4 September 2007 ]
QUOTE
Many well known and respected professors have expressed significant criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report.  Several even allege government complicity in the terrible acts of 9/11... 
UNQUOTE
If a doctor of religion has a view on 9/11 that is one thing. If his doctorate is in structural engineering I am prone to take him seriously. There are men with scientific background too.

 

Reporter, Times Are Criticized for Missteps [ 17  October  2005 ]
Judith Miller of the New York Times fingered the 9/11 men before it happened. This was part of the setting up in a Mossad false flag operation. See also Victor Ostrovsky and False Flag Operations

 

David Kelly Murder and Judith Miller
Doctor Kelly's last email before he was murdered or suicided was to Judith Miller complaining about dark forces. He qualified as a useful source for her. He knew about biological war. She was also getting input from Chalabi who was a thief on the run from 31 fraud raps and 22 years in a Jordanian slammer. See Friend of US and Iran has too many enemies.

 

Official 911 Collapse Story Is A Pack Of Lies [ 11 September 2019 ]
UOTE
A research team at the University of Alaska’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, led by Dr. Leroy Hulsey, Dr. Zhili Quan, and Professor Feng Xiao, Department of Civil Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, released on September 3, 2019, for public comment their findings from a four-year study of the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 on September 11, 2001. This is the first scientific investigation of the collapse of the building. Here is the conclusion:

“The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.”

Notice three things: (1) it has taken 18 years to get a real investigation of the destruction of a building blamed on Muslim terrorists, (2) the only way “near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building” can occur is through controlled demolition, and (3) this remarkable finding is not reported in the presstitute media.

In other words, the study is assigned to the Memory Hole. This is the way The Matrix operates. This is why you need this website. The only purpose of print and TV news is to program you so that you insouciantly go along with the agendas of those who rule you. Those who sit in front of TV news, listen to NPR, or read newspapers are programmed to be mindless automatons.
UNQUOTE
George Orwell was wrong about Big Brother in his book, Nineteen Eighty Four. It is not that bad; it is worse.

 

 

See also 9-11, the Aftermath

 

Errors & omissions, broken links, cock ups, over-emphasis, malice [ real or imaginary ] or whatever; if you find any I am open to comment.

Email me at Mike Emery. All financial contributions are cheerfully accepted. If you want to keep it private, use my PGP key.  Home

Updated  on Tuesday, 12 March 2024 13:12:28