Theresa May

Theresa May A Friend Of Israel
QUOTE
Anyone wondering about the priorities of Mrs Theresa May should follow her actions from the moment she learned she was to become Britain’s next Prime Minister. Her first act was to sign a pledge committing her to remember the Holocaust and “stand up to hatred and intolerance”. And her second was to spend the evening before her confirmation by the Queen at a private dinner at the home of Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis. Whatever else awaits the British people, they can be under no doubt that their new leader is once again a true Friend of Israel.

In a parliamentary career marked by cowardice and a tendency to go along with whichever political wind is blowing, it is hard to say which has been Mrs Theresa May’s most inglorious moment. Was it her decision, as Home Secretary, to throw open Britain’s borders and allow immigration to arise to record levels — after being elected specifically on a promise to reduce it? Perhaps it was her plans to target “non-violent extremists” via blacklists, internet free-speech restrictions and movement bans?

For many nationalists, the most egregious moment in this wretched woman’s career came in a speech she gave at the Finchley United Synagogue in April 2015 when she defiled the memory of British servicemen killed in Palestine 1939 — 1948 by praising, instead, their Jewish terrorist killers.

Thus the woman about to become the British Prime Minister tarnished the sacrifice of an estimated 784 British servicemen, police and crown officers killed in what is — for the Friends Of Israel — one of the most embarrassing episodes in British colonial history (see Note below). She did not even have the decency to deliver this stab in the back behind closed doors.

Understandably, there has been much glee in the Jewish press over the elevation of such a devoted Friend of Israel to the position of Prime Minister. The Times of Israel said she was widely regarded as a good friend.

It was the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris that gave Mrs May the opportunity to demonstrate that the welfare of the Jewish community was at the top of her priorities. Most of the Charlie Hebdo victims were non-Jewish but that detail seemed to escape Mrs May. Or maybe it was just not important. She said at the time “I never thought I would see the day when members of the Jewish community in the United Kingdom would say that they were fearful of remaining here in our country. And that means that we must all redouble our efforts to wipe out anti-Semitism here in Britain.”

Warming to her theme she said “without its Jews, Britain would not be Britain,” and then she said “Jewish people have long been an important and integral part of this country”.

Asserting that “the safety of the Jewish people can never be taken for granted,” Mrs May said it is a “tragic fact of history that the Jewish people have had to protect themselves against repeated attempts to obliterate them.” She even repeated David Cameron’s words that, “If the Jewish community does not feel secure then our whole national fabric is diminished.” Fine words, if only the White communities of Rotherham and elsewhere could find someone to defend their interests with as much passion.

There was another curious boast during that Finchley speech which came at a time when prosecution of “historic” war crimes is still popular in Germany and elsewhere. For Mrs May said she was proud of changing the British law to make it impossible to prosecute Israeli war criminals in the UK under Universal Jurisdiction, so that alleged killers such as Tzipi Livni and Israeli officers involved in crimes against Palestinian civilians can roam free in Britain. Pro-Palestinians in Britain applied in court for an arrest warrant issued for Livni who was Foreign Minister during Israel’s brutal 2008 Operation Cast Lead operation but thanks to the intervention of the British government, automatic immunity was granted to Israeli government officials visiting Britain.

But that later Finchley speech showed even more shameless self-abasement. Mrs May complimented Israel’s leading role in combating human trafficking, and omitted to mention the abuse of Palestinians and its expulsion of African workers from the Zionist state.

It was also an occasion on which Mrs May declared her allegiance to the so-called “Community Security Trust,” a Jewish vigilante body. Four months ago she was given a standing ovation at the annual CST dinner for handing over £13.4 million of British taxpayers money to this sinister organisation which claims to protect Jewish schools and synagogues. (This figure represented a £2 million increase on the figure promised by David Cameron the previous year which in itself was an increase of £3 million on the year before that!)

Not long after Britain joined the international commitment to defend Charlie Hebdo’s freedom to satirize Islam, Theresa May’s Home Office began a prosecution against a White nationalist called Joshua Bonehill for publishing Holocaust cartoons on the internet. Bonehill was sentenced to three years and three months of imprisonment and has since been charged in prison for two-year old “race hate” tweets against a Jewish MP, the fragrant Luciana Berger.

There are numerous examples of Mrs May’s cowardice but most recently she showed a lamentable talent for failing to give leadership when the situation most called for it during the EU referendum debate. Instead of defending her position in the Remain camp she kept her head down and was invisible during the campaign. A gross dereliction of duty by any standard.

The elevation of Theresa May can be seen as the mirror-image of the fate of her opposite number. The end game has now surely begun for Jeremy Corbyn, the embattled leader of the Labour Party. Normally it would be good riddance — Corbyn is an odious open borders internationalist and loud enthusiast for flooding Britain with the Third World. In every way then, Corbyn someone who would normally be acceptable to the political elite. Except one — his sentimental attachment to the one group of people he does feel some affinity for — Palestinians. This has set him beyond the pale of our political puppet masters, so Corbyn has to go.

It looks as if his defenestration may come at the hands of a veteran leftie. In their political outlook, leadership challenger Angela Eagle is pretty much indistinguishable from Corbyn but is shrewd enough to stay away from the Middle East. She voted for the Iraq war and two years ago was one of a handful of MPs who voted against recognising the state of Palestine. Significantly the Times of Israel reported that she recently met a delegation of Jewish students to pledge her committment to fighting anti-Semitism.

One of the most entertaining aspects of the media coverage around all this concerns the questions that journalists are scurrilously avoiding asking. Such as, if it had not been for the entirely fabricated anti-Semitism scare, would this Labour leadership contest be happening? Of course the answer is no, because the rise of Theresa May and the fall of Corbyn are due to the same reason — that it is as unthinkable that we could have party leaders unacceptable to the Jewish lobby.

NOTE: As we have noted before, the story of the Palestine Mandate and the casualties that the British suffered, is one that the authorities are only too eager to drop down the rabbit hole. The British must not be reminded of the deaths inflicted by Jewish terrorists against British servicemen throughout World War II. This terrorist campaign was also vigorously conducted as allied troops landed on Normandy and fought their way through France.

The casualties included a 25-year old gunner called Harold Yates from Sheffield whose death may be attributable to the presence of a Zionist “fifth column” in Britain which gave the go ahead for the attack in which he was killed. A veteran of Dunkirk, he was guarding a railway injunction when he was shot down by terrorist wearing British army uniforms. The attacks on British servicemen were acts of treachery that can be compared with the bombing of the USS Liberty.

The atrocities also included the King David bombing in which 91 were killed by the Irgun organisation. Also there was the savage killing of 20-year-old sergeants Clifford Martin and Mervyn Paice. The two men were kidnapped, held for 28 days and then strangled. Their bodies were left hanging in a eucalyptus grove and were booby trapped with land mines.
UNQUOTE
Is she ours or theirs?

Theresa May Is A Tool Of Zionist Crazies
QUOTE
(GLARING Hypocrisy) Since the announcement that Theresa May would succeed David Cameron as British Prime Minister, the Jewish press have been writing up a self-congratulatory storm about the “Good News” — that the new, unelected Prime Minister is a true friend of Israel and the wider Jewish community. See here, here, here, here and here.

Naturally, none of them have expressed their views in open, but Theresa May was the clear favorite of the Jewish community.

Shortly after Cameron’s announcement, May solidified her reputation by signing her name to a rather particular pledge. The Jewish Chronicle writes:

In what is thought to be her first act as Prime Minister-in-waiting, Mrs May signed a pledge launched by the Holocaust Educational Trust in memory of Sir Nicholas Winton, at its annual ambassador’s conference.

Of course, this one alleged holocaust stands above all others as being so horrendous it can never be forgotten. Every couple of years or so, Jewish-run Hollywood contributes a regular injection of highly emotional propaganda to further the very lucrative Shoah business, ensuring up-and-coming generations are indoctrinated into the now-global Jewish holocaust religion that cannot, and must not, be questioned.
Theresa May pledges to never forget the #Holocaust

Theresa May pledges to never forget the #Holocaust

The sign May holds says it all: she has pledged to not only never forget, but also to continue to shape the future by propagating the story at every opportunity. How long until the UK joins the twenty-one other countries in which “holocaust denial” — aka using rational thinking and examining available evidence, or lack thereof — is designated a criminal offence?

One wonders if we’ll ever see May holding up a similar sign in solidarity with those whose ancestors were the victims of any of the following 20th century genocides perpetrated by Jews. Somehow, I doubt it.

Armenia, 1915: The Young Turks — part of the Dönmeh, a group of crypto-Jews that “converted” to Islam — were responsible for the genocide of 1.5 million Christians. The majority of those killed were Armenian, but the death toll also included Assyrians and Greeks. These Christians were starved to death, grotesquely tortured and murdered. Crucifixion was just one method of torture and death.
Christian Women Crucified in Armenia by Jewish Young Turks

Christian Women Crucified in Armenia by Jewish Young Turks

Russia, 1921-22: The first of three Holodomors perpetrated by the Bolsheviks, the vast majority of whom were Jewish, including Trotsky and Lenin. Angered by the resistance to collectivisation, Lenin ordered grain seizures to be increased. While stealing the only food people had, the Jewish Cheka (an acronym for “Special Commission for Fighting Counter-Revolution”, as well as a Yiddish expression for animal slaughter) also committed unspeakable atrocities. Children were shot if they were found eating, some people were crucified or scalped, and others had their stomach cut open and part of their intestine pulled out and nailed to a tree or telegraph pole, around which the victim was forced to run until the entire intestine had come out.

The death toll for this first Holodomor, death by starvation, was up to five million ethnic Europeans, the majority of whom were Christians. When asked to help with the famine, Trotsky responded thus:

You are starving? This is not famine yet! When your women start eating their children then you may come and say we are starving.

Ukraine, 1932-33: The second, most widely known Holodomor resulted in death by starvation of 7.5-10 million Ukrainians. Again, mainly Christians. The Jews at the helm of implementing Stalin’s first Five-Year-Plan were Lazar Kaganovich, Genrikh Yagoda and Nikolai Yezhov. This Holodomor was also accompanied by similarly horrific atrocities, tortures and murders.

Despite the unspeakable horrors and high death toll in this relatively short period of time, Ukraine’s Chief Rabbi, Yakov Dov Bleich, was quoted in the Baltimore Jewish Times on November 14, 2007 as saying:

We can’t equate the Holocaust of the Jews in Germany with the Holodomor in Ukraine. Ukrainian Jewish leaders do not support recognizing the Holodomor as genocide.

Ukraine, 1946-47: The third Holodomor resulted in, approximately, one million deaths by starvation. Thus, 13.5-16 million ethnic Europeans, mainly Christians, died in these three genocides, combined.

Soviet Union, 1917-57: Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn stated that 66 million people, most of whom were Christian, were killed by the Bolsheviks and Stalin combined. This figure includes the three Holodomors, above. In Two Hundred Years Together, Solzhenitsyn’s last book, he writes:

Without Jews there would never have been Bolshevism. For a Jew nothing is more insulting than the truth. The bloodthirsty Jewish terrorists have murdered sixty-six million in Russia from 1918 to 1957.

The following Trotsky quote from 1917 clearly shows that the driving motivation of the Jewish Bolsheviks had nothing to do with liberating the workers and peasants, but everything to do with imposing tyrannical rule upon the Russian people:

We must turn Russia into a desert populated by white negroes upon whom we shall impose a tyranny such as the most terrible Eastern despots never dreamt of. The only difference is that this will be a left-wing tyranny, not a right-wing tyranny. It will be a red tyranny and not a white one. We mean the word ‘red’ literally, because we shall shed such floods of blood as will make all the human losses suffered in the capitalist wars pale by comparison. The biggest bankers across the ocean will work in the closest possible contact with us. If we win the revolution, we shall establish the power of Zionism upon the wreckage of the revolution’s funeral, and we shall became a power before which the whole world will sink to its knees. We shall show what real power is. By means of terror and bloodbaths, we shall reduce the Russian intelligentsia to a state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence. […] At the moment, our young men in their leather jackets, who are the sons of watchmakers from Odessa, Orsha, Gomel and Vinnitsa, know how to hate everything Russian! What pleasure they take in physically destroying the Russian intelligentsia — officers, academics and writers!

— From the ‘Memoirs’ of Aron Simanovich, quoted in The Nature of Zionism by Vladimir Stepin, Moscow, 1993, and translated from Russian into English by Clive Lindhurst

The evening after May signed the “never forget” pledge she dined with Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis at his home in London. While the invitation had, reportedly, been issued and accepted some weeks beforehand, it’s a clear indication of May’s close relationship with the British Jewish community, as stated by Haaretz, in an article entitled, “Theresa May Will Be a Formidable PM and a True Friend of Israel”. Of course, a “close relationship” with the Jewish community and Israel is a pre-requisite for anyone with political ambitions, whether in the United Kingdom or the United States.

How good a “friend” May is to the British Jews and Israel can be seen clearly in the below video. On April 22, 2015 May gave an obsequious speech at a Bnei Akiva celebration of Israel’s “independence day”. In the speech, May reiterates the following sentiment, originally expressed in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo false flag (more on the false flag here):

Jewish people have long been an important and integral part of this country. We cherish the enormous contribution you make, not just in the past, but today and every day. And as I said that day, echoing those who proudly proclaimed “Je suis Charlie”, “Je suis Ahmed” and “Je suis Juif”, without its Jews Britain would not be Britain, just as without its Muslims Britain would not be Britain, without its Sikhs, Hindus, Christians, and people of other faiths and none, Britain would not be Britain. We are a thriving, liberal, modern country precisely because of this rich co-existence of people of different faiths, backgrounds and ethnicities. It is what makes this country what it is.

Sure, the Jewish people have been an integral part of British history, ever since the day William the Conqueror invaded England in 1066, his conquest directly financed by Jews who had been expelled from Spain. (Bizarrely, the Norman Conquest is still celebrated in England today. [ First I've heard of it - Editor ].)

The 2,600 Jews who followed in the wake of the invasion grew to 16,000 by the year 1290, at which point Edward I expelled them, primarily due their usurious practices. Two hundred and fifty-seven years later, in 1647, Oliver Cromwell accepted Jewish money to further his Roundhead fight against the Cavaliers. In return, Cromwell agreed to allow the expelled Jews back into England.

In 1689, William of Orange ascended to the throne as King William III, his invasion fully financed by Jewish money. He continued to take yet more Jewish money to finance his costly wars with France, resulting in the Jews being given a charter to establish the Bank of England in 1694. This led to the creation of the national debt, with the resulting interest being paid through the raising of taxes.

The next major step in the illustrious British-Jewish history that May holds so dear was when, through deception, following the Battle of Waterloo of 1815, the Rothschilds gained control of the British economy and, ultimately, the Bank of England. Which, of course, led to their owning or controlling all of the world’s central banks.

While “Britain’s Jews Embrace Appointment of Pro-Israel PM Theresa May”, one thing we can be sure of is that the new British Prime Minister will do everything in her power to please and appease both Israel and the British Jews, thus prioritising her, and Britain’s, relationship with the “only democracy in the Middle East”, as well as the 0.42% of the UK population that comprise British Jews. May’s job depends on submitting to the Jewish lobby that represents British Jews, as well as to the State of Israel, which owes it existence largely to Lord Balfour’s actions during World War I and Adolf Hitler’s actions prior to World War II.

Balfour agreed to give Palestine to the Zionists in return for an assurance that Britain would win the war (Britain had effectively lost the war by 1916 and was in receipt of a peace offer from Germany). Immediately, the Jewish-controlled press in America switched from writing positively and sympathetically about Germany to printing propaganda portraying brutal German Huns destroying Europe. This was followed by the false-flag sinking of the Lusitania, an event for which we have Winston Churchill to thank. Under his command as First Lord of the Admiralty the Lusitania was deliberately sent, at reduced speed, on a collision course with a U-boat.

Eighteen years after the Lusitania incident, Hitler played his part in furthering the Jewish-Zionist goal by signing the Haavara Agreement with Zionist German Jews. The pact enabled German Jews to relocate to Palestine with the vast majority of their wealth intact, resulting in 60,000 German Jews emigrating to Palestine between 1933-39.

This brief history lesson begs the question — if Jewish finance and influence can make possible the conquering of nations, numerous wars throughout history, and the United States involvement in World War I, what chance does May stand against the British Jews and Israel? Like all politicians before her, she knows very well that the Jews who control the money supply ultimately control the country.

Or, as we say in Britain, Theresa May knows which side her bread is buttered on. And she’ll, no doubt, continue to shill for the Jews and Israel to ensure it stays that way.
UNQUOTE
Treason or does it just look like it? This article may have overstated the case but it is very much on the right lines.

Theresa May Stalling On Brexit [ 14 August 2016 ]
QUOTE
Ministers have warned that Britain could remain in the European Union until the end of 2019 - a delay which is likely to infuriate millions of Leave voters who wanted a smooth and quick Brexit.

More than half of Britain, 52 per cent, voted to leave the EU on June 23 but the decision to begin key negotiations to exit might be delayed as Prime Minister Theresa May's new departments might not be ready in time. Mrs May, 59, was expected to invoke article 50 - the formal trigger to start the move towards the EU exit - in a five months' time in January.

But the former Home Secretary might have to postpone the move due to a number of reasons which could halt the process.
UNQUOTE
Cameron said he would trigger Article 50. He lied. Theresa May favoured remaining; it seems all too clear that she still does. The plan for getting out has been worked; it's called Flexcit. It is sensible, practical, involving good sense and good will. It is the fully prepared exit plan. A determination to fail is not going to help but then Her Majesty's Government is corrupt, malign, the Enemy Within.

Theresa May Will Go For BREXIT And Grip Immigrants [ 5 October 2016 ]
QUOTE
The Prime Minister has laid down the gauntlet to Brexit opponents and Brussels, accusing them of 'insulting democracy' and making clear that regaining control over immigration is a red line. The uncompromising speech came as she revealed that Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty - the formal two-year mechanism for quitting the EU - will be triggered by March. Mrs May also unveiled plans to enshrine all the bloc's rules into domestic law, arguing that the move will help smooth the transition and unnecessary red tape can be abolished by parliament later.......Former minister Anna Soubry is among the MPs who have suggested they could vote against the repeal legislation.
UNQUOTE
It sounds as though Theresa May is going to deliver. Using Flexcit is thoroughly sensible. Disengaging English law from the European mish mash by stages will work.

Her Majesty's Prime Minister Addresses Nation - People Ignore Her [ 21 March 2019 ]
QUOTE
To read this rubbish go to the source.

UNQUOTE
May repeats the same lies, the same nonsense. May proves that she is not another Churchill. It was not her finest hour; more a case of trying to grab defeat from the jaws of victory. Even the those present weren't fool enough to swallow it.

Theresa May

Deportation decisions