List of Feminist Jews in America ex Wiki

• Bella Abzug, feminist politician

• Gloria Allred, feminist lawyer

• Andrea Dworkin, feminist writer

• Susan Faludi, feminist writer

• Leslie Feinberg, transgender activist & author

• Betty Friedan, co-founder & first president of NOW

• Robin Morgan, editor of Ms. Magazine

• Ernestine Rose, feminist

• Gloria Steinem, founder of Ms. Magazine (Jewish father)

• Rebecca Walker, feminist writer (Jewish father)

• Naomi Wolf, feminist writer

This list is from the Wikipedia which has an agenda. Inclusion is highly likely to be right. Exclusion means rather less They have been highly influential in getting the feminism racket going. Friedan was very much a founder of its modern and virulent form.
NB, before relying on the Wikipedia as an honest unbiased source look at Wikipedia

Wikipedia on Betty Friedan

Wikipedia on  Gloria Steinem

Rachel Adler

Wikipedia on Camille Paglia - long biographies tend to mean they are approved of. This is a bad sign.

 

Why You Are Not Married - A Woman Explains All
It is women that are desperate to get married. Blokes tend to be more relaxed about the whole thing.

 

Child database 'will ruin family privacy' [ 22 November 2006 ]
QUOTE
Parents will be devalued and family privacy shattered by mass surveillance of children.
UNQUOTE
You can attribute this to malice or incompetence. It is a take over of the family, the most fundamental unit of society, without which it will fall apart. That is the intention. It is claimed that it will cost  £224 million for the data base. It got over budget. They always do. This is some £18 per child. Do you ever get the feeling that nests are being feathered and being a friend of Blair pays off big time?

 

Is this doctor responsible for parents being falsely branded as child abusers?  [ 29 October 2007 ]
QUOTE
Dr Southall, has been praised as a pioneer by colleagues, while vilified as arrogant and dangerous by patients [ He looks like an arrogant rogue - Editor ]. He has also been in trouble over remarks he made concerning the case of Sally Clark, the mother who was given two life sentences for the murder of her two children before being released after medical evidence emerged to prove she was innocent.....

The suspicion is that justice may have been perverted by the paediatrician because vital evidence in the files — which established that the children he diagnosed as victims of parental abuse had never been harmed but were, in fact, genuinely sick — was deliberately hidden from criminal court judges [ This gets into the realm of major crime - Editor ].
UNQUOTE
Marietta Higgs tried it on and had 121 children stolen from their parents. See The women who went through an ordeal beyond belief.  She may well be unrepentant to this day. Other medics backed her on a basis of deep ignorance. See Stuart Bell - the relevant MP and very good. Professor Sir Roy Meadow was  very dangerous  too.

 

Collapse Of Family Life - Half Of Children See Parents Split By 16 [ 18 April 2011 ]
QUOTE
The collapse of family life: Half of children see parents split by 16 as births outside marriage hit highest level for two centuries. The astonishing speed at which traditional family life has collapsed is laid bare today. Shocking figures reveal that births outside marriage are at their highest level in two centuries and nearly half of children can expect their parents to separate by the time they turn 16.

Nine out of ten couples now live together before – or instead of – tying the knot. Before the Second World War, it was fewer than one in 30. From a situation 30 years ago where it was often considered shameful to have a child outside of wedlock, it has now become the norm...... Some 46 per cent of children are born to unmarried mothers, according to research by the Centre for Social Justice.

The think-tank said a child growing up in a one-parent family is 75 per cent more likely to fail at school, 70 per cent more likely to become a drug addict, 50 per cent more likely to have an alcohol problem and 35 per cent more likely to be unemployed as an adult.
UNQUOTE
This is not really new but it is news and important news at that. Society is being destroyed by various influences. Financial pressure is one, perhaps the most dangerous. Young couples cannot afford to leave home and start families. Buying is impossible for them; renting merely prohibitive. The source for this article is Centre for Social Justice, set up by Ian Duncan Smith, a politician so it will not be ignored.

 

The war on marriage It is all about controlling YOUR children   [ 2 September 2018 ]
QUOTE
Why does our new power elite hate lifelong marriage so much? Why does the legal arm of that elite, the Supreme Court, hand out what is left of the privileges of marriage to those who won’t get married, as it did with the widowed parents’ allowance on Thursday?

Why does the propaganda arm of our ruling class, the BBC, promote a drama called Wanderlust with publicity which, in the BBC’s own words, ‘asks whether lifelong monogamy is possible – or even desirable’. You know as well as I do that they’re not really asking. They are saying, amid countless wearisome and embarrassing bedroom scenes, that it is neither possible nor desirable. This is a lie, as millions of honest, generous and kind men and women proved in the better generations which came before this one............

It is where they discover the truth about the past, the lore of the tribe, the traditions and beliefs that make us who we are. It is where they become capable of being free.

But our new rulers don’t want that. They don’t want fully formed people who know who they are and where they come from. They want obedient, placid consumers, slumped open-mouthed in front of screens, drugged into flaccid apathy (legally or illegally, the Government don’t care which), slaving all hours in the dreary low-wage, high-tax economy they are so busily creating.............

In this, they are much like the Soviet Communists, who deliberately made divorce as easy as crossing the road, and made absolutely sure that hardly any parents could afford to stay at home to raise their own children.
UNQUOTE
Peter Hitchens, part Jew, ex-Marxist writes of what he knows. The Catholic Church told us back in the early 1950s that the Family was under attack. It was right then. Now it is threatened & perhaps doomed.

 

Anti-Incest Obsession Led To Individualistic Western Society   [ 14 November 2019 ]
QUOTE
The Medieval Catholic Church's 'obsession' with preventing incest could have triggered the rise of 'individualism' in modern Western society, a new study reveals. 

Traditional cultures and clans tended to remain fiercely loyal, with extended family marriages and a fear of outsiders, according to research by the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

But that started to change in Western societies in the 9th Century, when the Catholic Church changed its policy on who could get married, effectively banning close relatives from tying the knot..............

As a result, the team found that Western industrialised countries tend to be more individualistic, analytical, rich and democratic than other cultures around the world.
UNQUOTE
The Mail's writer seems to think that Inbreeding is not good, that outbreeding is better. The Catholic Church did too. Incest does cause Genetic disorders. See e.g. the next one.

 

Incestuous Parents Murdered Their Own Children   [ 14 November 2019 ]
QUOTE
The wretched and incestuous half-siblings who murdered two of their own children and tried to kill four more loved stamping childhood pets to death and began having sex as teenagers after he was taken from their mother into care, it was revealed today. 

Sarah Barrass, 35, and Brandon Machin, 39, were jailed for 35 years yesterday for strangling their son Tristan, 13, in front of 14-year-old Blake before killing him as social services edged toward rescuing them from their chaotic home life in Sheffield................

He added: 'They loved killing things and inflicting pain. We had mice. I walked in and Brandon and Sarah were laughing, chasing the mice – stamping on them, killing them. I tried to push them away but they were too strong'. 
UNQUOTE
Inbreeding has consequences. Muslim Inbreeding is a Huge Problem And People Don't Want to Talk About It. About half of them are inbred. It is higher with Pakistanis, around 70%.

 

The Number Of Two Parent Families Has Gone Up   [ 29 June 2021 ]
QUOTE
A recent report from the Institute for Family Studies (IFS), a conservative think tank, found that the number of children growing up in a two-parent home rose last year to over 70 percent for the first time in nearly 30 years.

In its report, which is based on U.S. Census Bureau data, the think tank, whose mission is to “strengthen marriage and family life, and advance the well-being of children,” found that the proportion of children in two-parent homes in the United States has risen gradually from 67.3 percent in 2005 to 70.4 percent in 2020.

“It is too early to say for certain but growing numbers of actual and would-be parents seem to be heeding the conventional wisdom that a stable two-parent family helps children flourish educationally, socially, and economically,” Nicholas Zill, a research psychologist and senior fellow at IFS, commented on the findings.........

One caveat that takes some of the sheen out of the findings, Zill argued, was that the U.S. Census Bureau lumps step-parent and adoptive families into birth-parent families, giving the headline number perhaps an overly optimistic appearance..............

The report also singled out as “one of the most encouraging developments” the sharp rise in the proportion of black children being raised by both biological parents, with the figure growing from 24 percent in 2012 to 30 percent in 2019.
UNQUOTE
In the early 1950s The Catholic Church was telling us that the Family was under threat. It was right. Their analysis was spot on; their responses were a failure. The attackers, disciples of Antonio Gramsci, the leading  intellectual of the communists in Italy used priests' shortcomings and the Mainstream Media to great effect. Be aware that the Sourcewatch account of the Institute for Family Studies is deeply hostile.

 

THE PATHOLOGY OF THE FEMALE HEADED FAMILY

From The Garbage Generation: Chapter I

Women are necessary for children. Fathers are necessary for civilization.

INTRODUCTION:

THE PATHOLOGY OF THE FEMALE-HEADED FAMILY

"Women," wrote Ramsey Clark in l970, in his celebrated book Crime In America, "are not a threat to the public." But he also wrote, in discussing the male juvenile criminals who are a threat to the public, that "three-fourths came from broken homes." That means mostly female-headed homes. That means that while the single mothers of these criminals do not themselves commit crimes and go to prison, the socialization they give their children has an extraordinarily high correlation with the male crime of the next generation. This socialization, in fact, is the "root cause of crime" which Clark wrote his book to explore. He had found the explanation he sought and he didn't know it. It was concealed by the generation-long time-lag between cause and effect and by the sex-switch between generations: like hemophilia, crime is manifested in males but carried and transmitted by females--or rather by single females. Instead of seeing the true connection, Clark gave his readers this:

If we are to deal meaningfully with crime, what must be seen is the dehumanizing effect on the individual of slums, racism, ignorance and violence, of corruption and impotence to fulfill rights, of poverty and unemployment and idleness, of generations of malnutrition, of congenital brain damage and prenatal neglect, of sickness and disease, of pollution, of decrepit, dirty, ugly, unsafe, overcrowded housing, of alcoholism and narcotics addiction, of avarice, anxiety, fear, hatred, hopelessness and injustice. These are the fountainheads of crime.

Not so. If we are to deal meaningfully with crime, what must be seen is its relationship with the female-headed family. Most criminals come from female-headed families. Most gang members come from female-headed families. Most addicts come from female-headed families. Most rapists come from female-headed families. Most educational failures come from female-headed families. Every presidential assassin before Hinckley came from a female-headed family or one in which he had an impossibly bad relationship with his father. Most illegitimate births occur to females who themselves grew up in female-headed families.

If we are to deal meaningfully with crime, what we must do is reduce the number of female-headed families; what we must do is prevent the divorce courts from expelling half of society's fathers from their homes; what we must do is terminate a welfare system which displaces millions of men from the principal male role, that of family-provider. What we must do is make the father the head of the family.

The female role, says Margaret Mead, is a biological fact; the male role is a social creation. This is the primary reality concerning human society. Motherhood has been the dominant feature of mammalian life since its beginning some two hundred million years ago, most conspicuously since the great reptiles became extinct and the Age of Mammals began sixty-five million years ago. Fatherhood in the sense of major male participation in reproduction is only a few million years old. Fatherhood in the sense of male headship of families is only a few thousand years old.

What is happening to our society is that it is discarding patriarchal sexual regulation and reverting to the primeval mammalian pattern of a reproductive unit consisting of the mother and her offspring, the male putting in an appearance to perform his minuscule sexual function and then disappearing or being hauled away to the sausage factory or being reduced to the role of stud who can be discarded when his female tires of him. "Men and women," rejoices feminist-anthropologist Helen Fisher, "are moving toward the kind of roles they had on the grasslands of Africa millions of years ago....Human society is now discovering its ancient roots....The recent trend toward divorce and remarriage is another example of a throwback to earlier times....[T]he so-called new extended family [read: broken family] may actually have evolved millennia ago....At long last, society is moving in a direction that should be highly compatible with our ancient human spirit....The 'traditional' role of women is a recent invention."

Biologically speaking, it is indeed a recent invention, scarcely older than the civilization which it made possible and which emerged coevally with it and created the wealth which reconciled women to accepting it. But women's new economic independence is leading them to yearn for a return to the prehistoric mammalian arrangement. "[W]herever women are economically powerful," says Fisher, "divorce rates are high. You see it in the Kung and you see it in the United States." Let's say, wherever women are economically powerful and there are no social guarantees to ensure male headship of families, divorce rates are high--such being the case among the Kung and the Americans. The Kung have no social guarantees to ensure male headship of families because the Kung never emerged from the Stone Age. The Americans have no social guarantees to ensure male headship of families because there exists an elementary confusion in the heads of policy makers, lawmakers and judges, who imagine that the obvious strength of the biological tie between the mother and the infant (the "biological fact" Margaret Mead refers to) means that it requires their assistance. A biological fact does not require the services of the legal system. What does require these services is the weakest biological link in the family, the role of the father. It was the creation of this role--only a few thousand years ago--which made patriarchal civilization possible. Prior to that, mankind had to muddle through the million years of the Stone Age with the female-headed reproductive arrangements of the ghetto, the barnyard and the rain forest.

ANNEX TO CHAPTER I
The Annex is an essential part of the argument of this book and logically belongs at this point in the text. To place it here, however, would be placing a stumbling block in front of the reader, asking him to plow through fifty pages of tedious documentation, filled with repetitious overkill, proving the assertions made in Chapter I. Like the textual notes in an edition of Shakespeare, which nobody reads and which only one reader in hundreds consults, it has to be in the book but it does not have to be read. It is enough that the reader should know that there exists (and can be consulted on pages 000-000) proof that the high-crime, low- achieving areas of society are those with the greatest numbers of families headed by women and that the low-crime, high-achieving groups in society are those with stable, patriarchal families--that the feminist/sexual revolution and its attempt to impose a social organization based on female kinship is a failure and that it is necessary to return to a social organization based on male kinship.

Chapter I
Chapter II
Chapter III
Chapter IV
Chapter V
Chapter VI
Chapter VII
Chapter VIII
Chapter IX
Chapter X
Chapter XI
Annex to chapter I
Additional note
References

Errors & omissions, broken links, cock ups, over-emphasis, malice [ real or imaginary ] or whatever; if you find any I am open to comment.

Email me at Mike Emery. All financial contributions are cheerfully accepted. If you want to keep it private, use my PGP key.  Home

Updated  on Monday, 12 February 2024 21:41:55