Aircraft Safety

Aircraft have a pretty good safety record. One major reason is that crashes tend to be very public knowledge and very bad for cash flow. That is what PanAm found out the hard way after the Lockerbie Job. It was not their fault but they just did not survive. The aircraft were sold off and rebadged. The aircrew were released into the community and probably found work flying, even perhaps with the same machines.

One aspect that gets no publicity whatsoever is the list of airlines banned from flying in Europe. It has the effect of confirming one's views about lesser breeds without the law. See Dodgy Airlines for more and better details

Maintenance is one of the key issues and tends to be very good with passenger airliners in particular. But one problem is huge, so enormous that the answer has been to ignore it and hope.

Weight reduction is a big issue in design so making wiring lighter was a step forward. Using high tech insulation made sense until things went wrong and go wrong they did big time. Normal electrical wiring uses PVC insulation which means fit and forget. Kapton, the wonder insulator worked well for a while then started to go drastically off. Becoming a conductor meant that circuit breakers popped, fuzes blew and sparks sparked. Catastrophic failure is not good when you are airborne.

The ultimate answer is that rewiring would be so expensive that they just carry on and hope.

Then there are Digital Flight Control Systems which can be good but which introduce subtle problems. Recall the Challenger, the Space Shuttle, which crashed on takeoff. See Personal observations on the reliability of the Shuttle written by Richard Feynman.

An early problem, which looked bad but was survived happened in 1988 with Aloha Airlines.
Update 2015: We now have to consider sabotage by Islamics. A recent success for them was the Russian Massacre 2015, which achieved 224 kills. Now we have major security breaches in France; see Enemy Aliens Penetrated Security AT FOUR French Airfields.

Enemy Aliens Penetrated Security AT FOUR French Airfields [ 28 November 2015 ]
Islamics are going airside in France. What are they taking with them? Bombs? Not yet. This is how the Russian Massacre 2015 was perpetrated. Using cheap labour, using Illegal Immigrants, using Islamics all lead to trouble, to death, to murder. Easyjet says it is not a threat; Easyjet does not want customers walking away. Nor do other airlines.
PS Cameron is importing Islamics; our wonderful government admits to importing 636,000 of them this year alone.

 

The RAF Experience With Kapton
QUOTE
INTRODUCTION

  1. An RAF TriStar aircraft was undergoing maintenance with the APU running when suddenly circuit-breakers popped, aircraft strobe lights flashed and the ground warning horn operated. Finally there was a loud bang and flash from the Left Hand side of the aircraft. After the excitement was over, the investigation revealed that a wiring loom, consisting of 168 wires carrying a variety of supplies had 69 wires completely severed!

  2. What could have caused this sequence of events? The investigation revealed that this highly dangerous situation was the result of a phenomenon known as carbon arc tracking. This devastating destruction of wiring is a fault that can occur with a type of cable insulation produced with a polyimide tape (trade name Kapton). How could a cable capable of this destruction be installed on an aircraft?

    BACKGROUND TO THE INTRODUCTION OF KAPTON
    Notwithstanding the advent of data-bus and fibre-optic links, the increased number of electronic and electrical equipments being fitted to modern aircraft, like the Tornado, has resulted in a proportionate increase in the number of interconnecting wires and cables. Whilst equipment manufacturers have been able to take advantage of microchip technology to reduce the size of their products, wire manufacturers have had to develop smaller lightweight wires having a performance equal to, or better than, previous wire types like Nyvin or Minyvin.

  3. Wire manufacturers sought new insulation materials which would possess qualities commensurate with more stringent requirements. Some manufacturers turned to a polyimide material in a tape form made by Dupont, possessing exceptionally good dielectric properties and high physical strength. These qualities allowed the thickness of the insulating material to be greatly reduced, in some cases down to six thousandths of an inch, which in turn improved heat dissipation, thus permitting smaller conductors to be used to carry the same current. The resultant wires were therefore thinner and lighter than previous types and showed a vastly improved mechanical performance in laboratory tests.

  4. Polyimide insulation with silver-plated copper conductors were approved for use on UK military aircraft in 1972 with the issue of Specification EL 2124, followed by EL 3001 for tin-plated conductors in 1981. Only the Lynx Helicopter and the (then) new-build Harriers had cabling to these specifications for airframe wire. Other polyimide types gained approval under PAN Standards as the main airframe wire for all marks of Tornado and Mil W 81381 for Harrier GR5. Polyimide has also been introduced on many older aircraft by the installation of modifications. Invariably, wire insulated with Polyimide has been hidden under an aircraft manufacturer’s specification, as opposed to the cable specification or NSN which made it unrecognizable to aircraft EA’s (Electrical Artificers?). As guidance was not sought from the equipment EA’s at the time, this type of insulation proliferated amongst mod kits issued over the last eight years as Design Authorities became pro-polyimide.

    REALISATION OF THE PROBLEM WITH POLYIMIDE
    The problem of fitting more wire into less space now appeared to be solved until the US Navy reported that they were experiencing excessive chafing, cracking and damage to the cable looms, especially in severe wind and moisture-prone areas (SWAMP). As these problems appeared to be attributable to a breakdown of the insulation material the US Navy conducted preliminary tests which revealed three potential problems which appeared to be unique to polyimide wire types:

    a. Hydrolysis  Hydrolysis is a phenomenon characterised by cracking and breakdown of the insulation material through exposure to moisture; the speed of breakdown depending on both temperature and stress.

    b. Wet Arc Tracking  Carbon arc tracking occurs when contaminating moisture or aircraft fluids create a short circuit between an exposed conductor and the aircraft structure or an adjacent exposed conductor at a different potential.

    c. Dry Arc Tracking  Carbon arc tracking occurs in dry conditions when one or more conductors are shorted as a result of abrasion from the aircraft structure, wire to wire abrasion, installation error or battle damage.

    THE THEORY OF CARBON ARC TRACKING
    The phenomenon of carbon arc tracking has been known for decades in the Electrical Distribution Industry and many test methods have been devised to classify the resistance of installation materials to failure by this mechanism. Fig 1 shows a strip of insulation material with an electrode attached to its surface at each end; if there is a suitable potential difference between the electrodes and if they are now bridged by a film of wet conducting contaminant, a current of a few milliamps will flow through the moist layer and cause slight heating.

  5. This heating will lead to the formation of an occasional very narrow "dry band" in the film (see Fig 2). When one of these bands is formed, most of the voltage between the electrodes is concentrated across the tiny dry gap and a small flashover will occur. This tiny arc cannot be sustained because of the high resistance of the moisture but in a typical situation such dry bands and sparks will occur continually and randomly over the surface in an effect known as scintillation. (ticking fault?)

  6. The micro arcs have a temperature around 1000 degrees Celsius and so cause intense heating of the insulation surface on a micro area basis sufficient to pyrolyse (chemically decompose by the action of heat) any organic polymer. The pyrolysis products of the particular polymer will determine its tracking behaviour.

  7. In the case of a "tracking" polymer (i.e. Kapton insulation) each scintillation will deposit a micro-spot of carbon char (see Fig 3) with a thermally stable conducting graphitic structure. There is no change in leakage current at this stage and the formation of spots will continue, often with a characteristic ‘tree’ pattern until a sufficiently complete path has formed to enable the next flashover to be sustained as a ‘power arc’ (see Fig 4) through the newly formed low resistance graphitic carbon track. At this point there is an electrical and thermal avalanche effect which will have a magnitude governed by circuit and power source impedance and by any circuit protection devices.

  8. In the case of a "non-tracking" polymer i.e. Ethylene Tetrafluorethylene (ETFE) and Polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) insulation, under the same conditions the intense micro heating of the surface gives gaseous pyrolysis products so that a minute quantity of polymer evaporates away leaving the composition of the insulation surface unchanged. There is therefore no char or track formation and no thermal or electrical runaway. The loss of tiny quantities of polymer (as gas) gives rise to erosion (see Fig 5) and the rate of erosion will depend upon the type of polymer. In the case of a non-tracking fluoropolymer the fluorinated gases given off have the additional property of suppressing electrical arcing.

  9. In summary, many aromatic polymers (compounds with carbon rings) are literally converted from insulators to conductors when subjected to very high temperatures (as in pyrolysis). It is this feature which appears to control the susceptibility of aromatic wire insulations to tracking at relatively low voltages (e.g. 16 volts).

  10. Examples of predominantly aromatic ‘tracking’ polymers include Kapton*, Peek* and Ultern*. Examples of predominantly aliphatic ‘non-tracking’ polymers (compounds with carbon chains) include Polyethylene (PE), Polyvinylidene (PVDF), Polyvinylchloride (PVC), Polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) and Tefzel*, a form of ETFE.

    *Trade names

    DRY ARC TRACKING
    More recent work shows that bundles of wire insulated with an aromatic ‘severe tracker’ can exhibit total bundle destruction via carbon arc tracking under completely dry conditions such as impact damage or when vibration leads to a conductor making direct contact with a metallic structure or a wire at a different voltage. The small arcs involved emanating from intermittent contact again convert adjacent wire installations to graphitic conductors and lead to catastrophic failure of the wire bundles. Where the wires are insulated with a non-tracking polymer, in an otherwise identical setup, there is no avalanche effect and no extension of damage beyond the initial fault.

    TYPE OF DAMAGE BEING EXPERIENCED


  11. Polyimide insulated wires can be found in many guises with a variety of part numbers and specifications; a selection of the most common is as follows:

    a.

    Polyimide insulation, liquid H lacquer topcoat

    Mil W 81381

    b.

    Polyimide insulation. Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene (FEP) lacquer topcoat

    EL 2124

    EL 3001

    PAN 6423

    c.

    Polyimide insulation. PTFE tape lacquer topcoat

    PAN 6411

    ACT 150

    ACT 260

    d.

    PTFE tape. Polyimide insulation. FEP or PTFE topcoat

    EFA 200

    MDS 4480

  12. Polyimide insulation can be recognised by its bright translucent copper colour. This is often misinterpreted as the conductor being exposed when the topcoat cosmetic layer has been removed due to damage. Although this has not degraded the cables insulating properties, this mottling of the cable does lead to actual chafes being harder to detect amongst flaking lacquer. Complacency can also creep in with tradesmen assuming it is actually flaking lacquer. A considerable amount of flaking is now being exhibited on the Tornado and BAE 146 and many man-hours are being expended by electrical tradesmen re-evaluating damage that has already been examined on a previous occasion.

  13. Cracking and splitting of the polyimide insulation is normally found where cable bend radii have been exceeded or excessive flexing of the wires allowed. This form of damage has been found on numerous occasions within Tornado weapons pylons. This damage has been accelerated by hydrolysis action within the SWAMP areas. Once this type of damage has occurred and the conductors are exposed, the looms are in a primed condition for a wet or dry carbon arc track event. There are already occurrences of inadvertent weapons release from the Tornado due to this type of damage.

  14. Polyimide is a tape-wrapped insulation with, in some cases, a PTFE tape-wrap as a topcoat. In manufacture these tapes are sintered together to seal them in place. Experience has shown that flexing and damp conditions allow these tapes to unwrap, once again exposing the conductors.

  15. Polyimide insulated wires are stiffer than other types of wire and this has proved to be its weakness in fighter aircraft. It is reluctant to move with areas of vibration and so chafe damage is inflicted on the insulation. Due to the volume of wiring on current fighter aircraft, where space is at a premium, cable is susceptible to inadvertent damage by tradesmen removing or fitting equipments. If this minor scuffing is ignored then catastrophic consequences could result. If we are to avoid a high maintenance bill then husbandry of wiring installations must be improved.

    MAINTENANCE OF POLYIMIDE INSULATED WIRING

  16. The following paragraphs set out guidelines for the correct maintenance of polyimide insulated wiring.

  17. Routing and Tying  Harnesses should be routed and supported well so that they will stay in position and not contact installed equipments or structure. Looms should not be readjusted during servicing and the build standard maintained by ensuring correct lengths between cleating and equipments. Ties should be spaced close enough to hold the harness together, preventing splaying of individual wires where the harness bends to avoid snagging when maintenance is carried out in the area.

  18. Harness Twist  Harness flexibility is greatly improved if the wire are twisted (one to two turns per foot) prior to tying. Twisting allows the harness to bend by rotational motion of the wires, rather than trying to stretch the wires. This is carried out in initial build and should be maintained during rewire and modification action.

  19. Hinge areas  Harnesses which must cross areas of relative motion (eg wing fold mechanisms, landing gear and hinged access panels) should be mounted so that the loom will twist rather than bend when the joint moves. Care must be taken to ensure that the loom does not bind or pinch during motion.

  20. Connector Strain Relief   It is important that strain relief supports be reinstated after maintenance and that the wire is properly routed and supported by them. This is especially relevant with the single tie-wrap post back shells which do not have the same grip on the cables as the older saddle clamps. Accurate cutting to length of the loom should be carried out especially on 90 degree clamps, in order to avoid single wires being placed under stress.

  21. Bend radius  Harnesses should be installed with bends as generous as possible to avoid strain on the wires as the structure flexes. The minimum bend radius allowed is six times the diameter of the loom or ten times the diameter of the original wire – whichever is the greater. The minimum bend radii have been exceeded on some fly leads at the rear of connectors even during aircraft build. This practice should not be repeated on re-wires.

  22. Use of Test Prods  Piercing of the insulation for testing purposes is STRICTLY FORBIDDEN.

  23. Stripping and Crimping  Great care must be taken to avoid any insulation damage with stripper and crimping tools. Any scuffing of the insulation from blades or grips is to be considered unserviceable and the cable re-prepared.

  24. Wire Marking  All marking must be carried out using the tape dwell time, temperature and pressure recommended by the wire manufacturer. Where hot stamp identification marking is involved, a mandatory high voltage spark test must be carried out after marking. A badly printed cable, which burnt through to the conductor, was the cause of six feet of loom being destroyed in a carbon arc on a civilian airliner. ‘Inter-connect’ and ‘Equipment Wires’ should not be hot stamp printed.

  25. Inspections   Every opportunity should be taken to inspect installed wiring for signs of damage or chafing. This should be done when equipments or panels are removed and access can be gained to normally obscure areas. Inspection is especially important after servicing has been carried out and is essential prior to panelling up. All trades should be aware of the dangers of even minor damage to Polyimide and an electrical tradesman with 10X magnification should be called to inspect all instances of suspected damage. Cable looms should be maintained clean and dry and contamination of cables by toilet and galley waste should be rigorously prevented.

  26. Damaged wire   If any flats are detected on the translucent copper polyimide insulation, apart from missing lacquer, then it should be assumed that some of the insulation has been removed and the cable should be repaired or replaced. Repairs to the cable should be carried out in accordance with AP100B-01 Order 4901 using the environmentally sealed in-line splices.

  27. Wire Installation  The practice of ‘pulling through’ cables during replacement should be avoided. If cables are ‘laid in’ then damage to the top-coat lacquers would be avoided and the snagging of PTFE topcoats, causing the tapes to separate, would also be prevented.

CONCLUSIONS

  1. As a reminder that these precautions are essential for flight safety, it is worth emphasizing that polyimide wiring was implicated as a contributing factor in the loss of two Tornados. Furthermore, numerous ground fires have been recorded as a result of damage to this type of wiring. Laboratory tests have shown that the power of the Carbon Arc not only can destroy wiring looms, but can severely damage structures.

  2. Without doubt, complacency cannot be allowed to creep in when handling polyimide wiring. It is no longer a ‘fit and forget’ component or a suitable place for hanging your torch in confined areas. To maintain our aircraft in an airworthy condition, it is essential that cables be continually inspected, cleaned and re-cleated. It should be noted that this form of inspection and maintenance will be with us for some time as Harrier GR5, Sentry AEW and Tristar all contain a polyimide construction of cable that is even more susceptible to carbon arc tracking than Tornado wiring!

UNQUOTE
It all sounds right. Maintenance needs to be first class and conscientious. Failure comes at a price.

 

Die By Wire
QUOTE
MANGOLD:   As millions of British tourists prepare to fly on their sunshine holidays, Panorama reveals the explosive secret hidden inside their planes.......   Every large modern passenger jet contains some 150 miles of wiring.  The hidden blood vessels that carry power the thousands of functions today’s modern jets must perform.  For years the manufacturers have treated wire as wire.  Fit and forget.  But that’s all changing.  Wiring is not as innocent as it first looked.  Seattle, home of the Boeing Aircraft Company, 90% of the planes flying today come under its wing.  Until 8 years ago, most of its aircraft contained a particular aircraft wire insulated with a plastic material known colloquially as ‘Kapton’.

This is a piece of Kapton insulated wire. It’s still made this day and flies in over a third of the world’s commercial planes.  Kapton is best when young.  It’s feather weight, the thickness of only about three human hairs, flame resistant, tough.  That was the good news.  And this is the bad.  The Kapton insulation can explode like a firework if it’s chafed and rubs against metal.  That’s called ‘dry arcing’.  Worse still, salt water or solvent can penetrate the insulation and cause the same problem.  That’s called ‘wet arcing’.  Most wires, when they shirt-circuit [ sic ], simply spark and blow a fuse.  But with Kapton insulation, the spark explodes and arc’s setting light to the plastic insulation.  Inside the confines of the plane, and with alarming speed, this can quickly spread into a lethal weapon of toxic fumes and flames.  And this is the culprit - Kapton insulation burnt to a crisp.  

MIKE NANCARROW Director of Airplane Safety Boeing We haven’t seen anything that we consider, at this point in time, anything that could be attributable to the wiring type, whether it’s Kapton or any other wiring type at this point.  

MANGOLD   So are you saying essentially Boeing has no problem with Kapton insulation and has never had one?  

NANCARROW:   That is correct.  

MANGOLD:   But one man who believes that’s bunkum is Ed Block.  For ten years the Pentagon’s top wiring expert, and now member of the government committee investigating problems with aircraft wiring.  He’s a merciless opponent of dangerous wire insulation on planes, prodding an airline industry he believes is simply unable to face the truth about Kapton wire.  Today he’s inspecting old wiring at this aeroplane graveyard in Arizona.  

ED BLOCK:   We have to first get out of the denial phase and say that we do have a wiring problem.  There’s an horrific amount of wire damage out there unbeknownst to everyone. They were not designed to be inspected, they were not designed to be worked on.  That’s why most of them, as you can see, are lint covered and have metal shavings in the lower sections due to cabin changes and conversions.  It’s just everywhere. 
UNQUOTE
Fly Kapton or do not fly. Those are the options. So we fly and hope.

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/06/business/06air.html?_r=1&ref=business
An early problem, which looked bad but was survived happened in 1988 with Aloha Airlines. The pilot got it back down:-

The airframe would have been a write off.

 

Dodgy Airlines
The European Airline Ban List tells us which airlines are not allowed to fly in Europe. It specifies the countries of origin and has the effect of confirming all of one's prejudices against various uncivilized countries. Most of them are smaller countries in Africa or Asia. One exception is Garuda from Indonesia. It got a pass but I will be not going with them again.

From http://ec.europa.eu/transport/modes/air/safety/air-ban/index_en.htm

Air
List of airlines banned within the EU

Europe has one of the best aviation safety records in the world thanks to the effective implementation of high standards. Working in close cooperation with safety authorities in Member States, other countries and international aviation organisations, the European Union strives to raise these standards across the world. However, some airlines still operate in conditions which fall below essential and internationally recognised safety levels.

To improve safety further, the European Commission – in close consultation with the aviation safety authorities of all Member States – has decided to ban certain airlines from operating in European airspace, because they are found to be unsafe and/or they are not sufficiently overseen by their authorities. To consult the list of banned airlines, you can download the document below (full list) or search on this site by clicking on the button 'Search banned airlines'.

Download full list [472 KB] - updated on 10/04/2014

The first list (Annex A) includes all airlines banned from operating in Europe. The second list (Annex B) includes airlines which are restricted to operating in Europe under specific conditions. Both lists are updated regularly and published in the Official Journal of the European Union. Before taking any action based on the information in these lists, all users should ensure they have the latest version.

Latest press release: IP/14/415, 10/04/2014

Suriname
Ghana
Afghanistan
Angola
Benin
Congo
Djibouti
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Gabon
Indonesia
Kazakhstan 
Kyrgyzstan
Mozambique
Nepal
Philippines
Sao Tome and Principe
Sierra Leone
Sudan
Zambia

 


Fly Safe - Fly Air NZ  [ 10 January 2015 ]
Look at the nationalities to see who to go with. Europeans are all right. Japan of course. Oz & New Zealand are first rate. Aeroflot is not too bad. Some Arab airlines are all right. I will not be travelling with Garuda = Air Indonesia any more.  There is no mention of the airlines banned from Europe. See Dodgy Airlines
PS Avoid these like the plague:-
Afghanistan, Angola, Benin, Republic of the Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Gabon, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Mozambique, Nepal, Philippines, Sierra Leone, São Tomé and Príncipe, Sudan and Zambia. The list also includes two individual airlines: Blue Wing Airlines from Suriname and Meridian Airways from Ghana, for an overall total of 296 airlines.

 

Errors & omissions, broken links, cock ups, over-emphasis, malice [ real or imaginary ] or whatever; if you find any I am open to comment.

Email me at Mike Emery. All financial contributions are cheerfully accepted. If you want to keep it private, use my PGP key.  Home

Updated  on Saturday, 13 January 2018 09:29:00